www.ccun.org
www.aljazeerah.info
Al-Jazeerah History
Archives
Mission & Name
Conflict Terminology
Editorials
Gaza Holocaust
Gulf War
Isdood
Islam
News
News Photos
Opinion
Editorials
US Foreign Policy (Dr. El-Najjar's Articles)
|
|
|
Editorial Note: The
following news reports are summaries from original sources. They may
also include corrections of Arabic names and political terminology.
Comments are in parentheses. |
PLO: Israel defaulted on Oslo when it failed to remove 'outposts'
Published today (updated) 17/07/2009 14:45 Bethlehem - Ma’an -
“(Illegal Israeli settlements so-called) Outposts serve an important
function for Israel politically and territorially,” explains a new PLO
Negotiations Affairs Department report on the facts around Israeli
settlement outposts.
“Since the early 1990s,” the report
continues, “successive Israeli governments have committed not to build
new settlements. However, they have circumvented this commitment by
facilitating (and often sponsoring) the creation of new settlement
‘outposts,’ or ‘neighborhoods’ of existing settlements. On the ground,
outposts expand the amount of land under the parent settlement’s
control, and serve as ‘fillers’ or ‘connectors’ between settlements with
the aim of creating contiguity between them.”
The Negotiations
Affairs Department in the PLO details the “facts” and “myths” of Israeli
settlement outposts in an effort to draw attention to the phenomenon and
its detrimental effect on both trust for the Israeli establishment and
any possible continuation of peace talks in the future.
“The
current Israeli government, like all its predecessors since 2003,” said
the report, “has failed to implement its Road Map obligations. In
particular, it continues to obfuscate the issue of settlement outposts
in an attempt to circumvent its obligation to ‘immediately dismantle
settlement outposts erected since March 2001.’”
The report
explains that outposts are “no different” than settlements, in that they
take up Palestinian land and are, if possible, more illegal than their
parent settlements.
“Outposts are nothing more than nascent
settlements,” the report says, “typically established by placing
trailers or caravans at a particular site and often resulting in the
addition of permanent housing and infrastructure. They tend to be
located anywhere from several hundred meters to a few kilometers from
more established ‘parent’ settlements.”
The report also points
out that settlement outposts are “not a new phenomenon,” and stresses
that most to the major settlements on today’s maps were once settlement
outposts. Areas like Ma’ale Adumim near Ramallah, which is set as one of
the areas in the West Bank that Israel will likely not relinquish
control over in any final agreement, was once a small area of trailers
on the hills for 22 families. It has now been seemingly irrevocably
taken over by Israeli housing developments.
Sharon: “Move, run,
grab more hills, and expand the territory”
The Negotiations
Affairs Department traces the surge in settlement outpost growth to just
after the development of the Oslo peace process. In 1998 Israeli Foreign
Minister Ariel Sharon encouraged Israelis to make bold land grabs in the
West Bank and Gaza Strip.
The report centers on the failure of
Israel to meet its Road Map obligations, and details the continuing
expansion of settlements and settlement outposts, as well as the few
“insignificant attempts” by the Israeli military to limit their growth.
The failure of Israel to limit settlement growth, according to the
report, nullifies the accords, as the “purpose underlying the obligation
as articulated in the Road Map was to nullify attempts to exploit the
absence of a peace process and to reverse the prejudicial effects of any
additional settlement activity.”
-- On the Net: Full
report here:
http://www.nad-plo.org/news-updates/NSU%20Outposts%20FS%20_Jul%202009_%20_2_.pdf
Fair Use
Notice
This site contains copyrighted material the
use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright
owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance
understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic,
democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this
constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for
in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.
Section 107, the material on this site is
distributed without profit to those
who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information
for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of
your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the
copyright owner.
|
|
|