| 
 Al-Jazeerah History
 
 Archives
 
 Mission & Name
 
 Conflict Terminology
 
 Editorials
 
 Gaza Holocaust
 
 Gulf War
 
 Isdood
 
 Islam
 
 News
 
 News Photos
 
 Opinion 
	
	
	Editorials
 
 US Foreign Policy (Dr. El-Najjar's Articles)
 
 www.aljazeerah.info
 
	  
           |  | 
      
        
          | Editorial Note: The 
		  following news reports are summaries from original sources. They may 
		  also include corrections of Arabic names and political terminology. 
		  Comments are in parentheses. |  
       
      
		Judge Allows Sami Al-Arian's Defense to File Motion to Dismiss Charges
 
 World View News Service
 March 12, 2009
 Judge says Justice 
		Department's Integrity at Stake
 
 Judge Leonie Brinkema ruled in 
		favor of
 a defense request to file a motion to dismiss the charges 
		against Dr.
 Sami Al-Arian at a hearing in federal court today. Her 
		decision follows
 new revelations that prosecutors in Florida were 
		opposed to efforts by a
 Virginia prosecutor to call Dr. Al-Arian to 
		testify in another case. The
 judge's important decision raises the 
		possibility that Dr. Al-Arian's
 ordeal could be resolved and that he 
		can finally regain his freedom
 after six years of grueling legal 
		battles.
 
 During the hearing earlier today, Assistant U.S. 
		Attorney Gordon
 Kromberg argued for the fourth time that the entire 
		issue of the 2006
 plea agreement is irrelevant to the criminal 
		contempt charges. The judge
 has repeatedly rejected that argument, 
		reaffirming on Monday that the
 "record is incomplete" and that the 
		government's response poses more
 questions than answers. Judge 
		Brinkema stated that there was "enough
 smoke" in the facts of the 
		case that needed to be cleared up.
 By the end of the hearing, the 
		judge said she was granting the defense's
 request to file for a 
		complete dismissal of the charges because "the
 integrity of the 
		Justice Department cannot be compromised."
 
 The judge began the 
		hearing by asking Kromberg how he became aware of
 the plea agreement 
		on March 1, 2006, despite the fact that it was filed
 under seal in 
		Florida the previous day, and was only known to the
 parties involved. 
		Evading the question, the prosecutor simply stated
 that he was able 
		to call Dr. Al-Arian to testify once the Florida judge
 imposed the 
		maximum sentence, a move that extended his imprisonment by
 eleven 
		months.. Judge Brinkema agreed with lead defense counsel Jonathan
 Turley that the plea agreement could not be breached by the government
 simply because Dr. Al-Arian received a longer sentence.
 Judge 
		Brinkema also pointed out that, contrary to the prosecution's
 assertions, the issue of the plea agreement has never been resolved
 since no other court has ever granted a hearing to examine all the
 evidence. After Kromberg concluded his statement to the court, Professor
 Turley noted that new facts had come to light in the government's recent
 court motion that had not been previously disclosed. Specifically, none
 of the courts that have addressed the issue of the plea agreement were
 made aware of an internal split within the Department of Justice on
 whether Dr. Al-Arian should be called to testify in Virginia. It has
 since come to light that prosecutors in Florida objected to efforts by
 Kromberg to compel Dr. Al-Arian's testimony. Professor Turley concluded
 by saying that now was the time for the court to consider these new
 facts and allow the defense to argue for the dismissal of the charges.
 
 In granting the motion, the judge expressed her disappointment with 
		the
 prosecutors' persistent refusal to present clear statements about 
		their
 conduct during the plea negotiations. She said that there are 
		serious
 questions about whether the government conducted bad faith 
		dealings with
 the defense that could now result in Dr. Al-Arian's 
		imprisonment. Before
 someone could be forced to give up their 
		individual liberty, she said,
 these issues should be resolved. She 
		suggested that although prosecutors
 had not offered their own 
		affidavits on the plea negotiations, she was
 "reading between the 
		lines" that there was "a meeting of the minds" that
 the intent of the 
		plea agreement was to conclude Dr. Al-Arian's business
 with the U.S. 
		government once and for all.
 
 Although Judge Brinkema was 
		originally expected to set a new trial date
 during today's hearing, 
		she instead gave the defense ten days to submit
 a motion to dismiss 
		the charges. Prosecutors will then have ten days to
 respond.
 
 An estimated twenty-five people, some hailing from as far as Tampa,
 Florida, attended the hearing today to express their support for Dr.
 Al-Arian.. The Tampa Bay Coalition for Justice and Peace would like to
 extend its appreciation to those individuals who have consistently stood
 up for justice in Dr. Al-Arian's case, led by Dr. Al-Arian's legal
 counsel, Professor Turley from George Washington University and William
 Olson and P.J. Meitl from the law firm of Bryan Cave.
 
 
 
 
 Fair Use
      Notice This site contains copyrighted material the
      use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright
      owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance
      understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic,
      democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this
      constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for
      in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.
      Section 107, the material on this site is
      distributed without profit to those
      who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information
      for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
      If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of
      your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the
      copyright owner.
        
     |  |  |