| 
 Al-Jazeerah History
 
 Archives
 
 Mission & Name
 
 Conflict Terminology
 
 Editorials
 
 Gaza Holocaust
 
 Gulf War
 
 Isdood
 
 Islam
 
 News
 
 News Photos
 
 Opinion 
	
	
	Editorials
 
 US Foreign Policy (Dr. El-Najjar's Articles)
 
 www.aljazeerah.info
 
	  
           |  | 
      
        
          | Editorial Note: The 
		  following news reports are summaries from original sources. They may 
		  also include corrections of Arabic names and political terminology. 
		  Comments are in parentheses. |  
       
        HRW says Israel's use of white phosphorus evidence 
		of war crimes Date: 25 / 03 / 2009  Time:  20:08 Bethlehem – 
		Ma’an –
 Israel's repeated firing of white phosphorus shells over densely 
		populated areas of Gaza during its recent military campaign was 
		indiscriminate and is evidence of war crimes, Human Rights Watch said in 
		a report released on Wednesday. 
 Human Rights Watch is one of the 
		world’s leading independent organizations dedicated to defending and 
		protecting human rights.
 
 The 71-page report, "Rain of Fire: 
		Israel's Unlawful Use of White Phosphorus in Gaza," provides witness 
		accounts of the devastating effects that white phosphorus munitions had 
		on civilians and civilian property in Gaza.
 
 Human Rights Watch 
		researchers in Gaza immediately after hostilities ended found spent 
		shells, canister liners, and dozens of burnt felt wedges containing 
		white phosphorus on city streets, apartment roofs, residential 
		courtyards, and at a United Nations school. The report also presents 
		ballistics evidence, photographs, and satellite imagery, as well as 
		documents from the Israeli military and government.
 
 Militaries 
		use white phosphorus primarily to obscure their operations on the ground 
		by creating thick smoke. It can also be used as an incendiary weapon.
 
 "In Gaza, the Israeli military didn't just use white phosphorus 
		in open areas as a screen for its troops," said Fred Abrahams, senior 
		emergencies researcher at Human Rights Watch and co-author of the 
		report. "It fired white phosphorus repeatedly over densely populated 
		areas, even when its troops weren't in the area and safer smoke shells 
		were available. As a result, civilians needlessly suffered and died."
 
 The report documents a pattern or policy of white phosphorus use 
		that Human Rights Watch says must have required the approval of senior 
		military officers.
 
 "For the needless civilian deaths caused by 
		white phosphorus, senior commanders should be held to account," Abrahams 
		said.
 
 On 1 February, Human Rights Watch submitted detailed 
		questions to the Israeli military about its white phosphorus use in 
		Gaza. It did not provide responses, citing an internal inquiry being 
		conducted by the country's Southern Command.
 
 In the recent Gaza 
		operations, Israeli forces frequently air-burst white phosphorus in 
		155mm artillery shells in and near populated areas. Each air-burst shell 
		spreads 116 burning white phosphorus wedges in a radius extending up to 
		125 meters from the blast point. White phosphorus ignites and burns on 
		contact with oxygen, and continues burning at up to 816 degrees Celsius 
		(1,500 degrees Fahrenheit) until nothing is left or the oxygen supply is 
		cut. When white phosphorus comes into contact with skin it creates 
		intense and persistent burns.
 
 When used properly in open areas, 
		white phosphorus munitions are not illegal, but the Human Rights Watch 
		report concludes that the Israeli military repeatedly exploded it 
		unlawfully over populated neighborhoods, killing and wounding civilians 
		and damaging civilian structures, including a school, a market, a 
		humanitarian aid warehouse, and a hospital.
 
 Israel at first 
		denied it was using white phosphorus in Gaza but, facing mounting 
		evidence to the contrary, said that it was using all weapons in 
		compliance with international law. Later it announced an internal 
		investigation into possible improper white phosphorus use.
 
 In a 
		statement sent to Ma'an, a spokesperson for the Israeli military vowed 
		to investigate, but said that "it is already possible to conclude that 
		the IDF's use of smoke shells was in accordance with international law."
 
 "These shells were used for specific operational needs only and in 
		accord with international humanitarian law. The claim that smoke shells 
		were used indiscriminately, or to threaten the civilian population, is 
		baseless," a military spokesperson said.
 
 Regardless, the 
		country's military has vowed a thorough and impartial investigation, but 
		Abrahams said that past investigations into allegations of wrongdoing 
		"suggest that this inquiry will be neither thorough nor impartial." 
		"That's why an international investigation is required into serious laws 
		of war violations by all parties," he said.
 
 The Israeli military 
		knew that white phosphorus poses life-threatening dangers to civilians, 
		Human Rights Watch said. A medical report prepared during the recent 
		hostilities by the Israeli Health Ministry said that white phosphorus 
		"can cause serious injury and death when it comes into contact with the 
		skin, is inhaled or is swallowed." Burns on less than 10 percent of the 
		body can be fatal because of damage to the liver, kidneys, and heart, 
		the ministry report says. Infection is common and the body's absorption 
		of the chemical can cause serious damage to internal organs, as well as 
		death.
 
 If the Israeli military intended to use white phosphorus 
		as a smokescreen for its forces, it had a readily available non-lethal 
		alternative to white phosphorus - smoke shells produced by an Israeli 
		company, Human Rights Watch concluded.
 
 All of the white 
		phosphorus shells that Human Rights Watch found were manufactured in the 
		United States in 1989 by Thiokol Aerospace, which was running the 
		Louisiana Army Ammunition Plant at the time. On 4 January, Reuters 
		photographed Israeli military artillery units handling projectiles whose 
		markings indicate that they were produced in the United States at the 
		Pine Bluff Arsenal in September 1991.
 
 To explain the high number 
		of civilian casualties in Gaza, Israeli officials have repeatedly blamed 
		Hamas for using civilians as "human shields" and for fighting from 
		civilian sites. In the cases documented in the report, Human Rights 
		Watch found no evidence of Hamas using human shields in the vicinity at 
		the time of the attacks. In some areas Palestinian fighters appear to 
		have been present, but this does not justify the indiscriminate use of 
		white phosphorus in a populated area, the group insisted.
 
 Human 
		Rights Watch said that for multiple reasons it concluded that the 
		Israeli military had deliberately or recklessly used white phosphorus 
		munitions in violation of the laws of war. First, the repeated use of 
		air-burst white phosphorus in populated areas until the last days of the 
		operation reveals a pattern or policy of conduct rather than incidental 
		or accidental usage.
 
 Second, Human Rights Watch said the Israeli 
		military was well aware of the effects of white phosphorus and the 
		dangers it poses to civilians. Third, the Israeli military failed to use 
		safer available alternatives for smokescreens, according to the human 
		rights organization.
 
 The laws of war obligate states to 
		investigate impartially allegations of war crimes. The evidence 
		available demands that Israel investigate and prosecute as appropriate 
		those who ordered or carried out unlawful attacks using white phosphorus 
		munitions, Human Rights Watch said.
 
 The United States 
		government, which supplied Israel with its white phosphorus munitions, 
		should also conduct an investigation to determine whether Israel used it 
		in violation of the laws of war, the group added.
 
 
 
 
 Fair Use
      Notice This site contains copyrighted material the
      use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright
      owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance
      understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic,
      democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this
      constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for
      in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.
      Section 107, the material on this site is
      distributed without profit to those
      who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information
      for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
      If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of
      your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the
      copyright owner.
        
     |  |  |