Al-Jazeerah: Cross-Cultural Understanding

 

News, November 2009

 
www.ccun.org

www.aljazeerah.info

Al-Jazeerah History

Archives 

Mission & Name  

Conflict Terminology  

Editorials

Gaza Holocaust  

Gulf War  

Isdood 

Islam  

News  

News Photos  

Opinion Editorials

US Foreign Policy (Dr. El-Najjar's Articles)  

 

 

 

Editorial Note: The following news reports are summaries from original sources. They may also include corrections of Arabic names and political terminology. Comments are in parentheses.

 
2 US Soldiers Missing, 3 Afghani Soldiers and 30 Alleged Taliban Fighters Killed

November 7, 2009

NATO strike kills 7 Afghan security forces: Kabul

by Waheedullah Massoud  –

Sat Nov 7, 2009, 7:55 am ET

KABUL (AFP) –

Seven members of the Afghan security forces were killed in a NATO air strike in remote western Afghanistan, the defence ministry said on Saturday.

The statement comes as NATO's International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) said it was investigating an incident in Badghis province on Friday in which more than 25 international and Afghan forces were wounded.

Five of the 25 wounded were US soldiers, injured in what a Western military official, speaking anonymously, said was friendly fire.

However, ISAF spokesman Lieutenant Colonel Todd Vician, of the US Air Force, told AFP: "We have nothing to confirm friendly fire."

"No ISAF members were killed," he said, confirming that five injured ISAF soldiers were Americans.

Investigations into Friday's incident were ongoing and no further details were available, he said.

In what appeared to be a reference to the same incident, however, the Afghan defence ministry said members of the Afghan army and police had been killed.

"Due to a NATO forces air strike on November 6 in Badghis province seven Afghan security personnel (both Afghan army and national police) were martyred and also some were wounded," it said in a statement.

"The commando brigade informs us that foreign forces also sustained some casualties," it said.

The incident is believed to have taken place during a clash involving ISAF and Afghan soldiers searching for two paratroopers from the 82nd Airborne Division who went missing on Wednesday during a routine supply mission.

Local police said a party looking for the two missing soldiers clashed with Taliban and that alliance aircraft were called in to provide support.

The defence ministry made no reference to a clash between the joint forces and Taliban militants.

Police said the casualties occurred when the air strike mistakenly targeted international troops.

The Western military officer who spoke on condition of anonymity told AFP it appeared to be a "blue-on-blue incident," or friendly fire, with "a huge number of casualties."

NATO began its search operation in the barren, rugged area together with Afghan forces after the two paratroopers disappeared.

Afghan police said the two had drowned while trying to retrieve cartons of food that had been dropped into a river.

More than 100,000 troops under NATO and US command are in Afghanistan fighting the Taliban (resistance movement) now at its deadliest in the eight years since US-led troops toppled the Taliban regime.

US President Barack Obama is currently considering a request from military commanders to boost troop numbers by up to 40,000, a decision not likely to be made public for a number of weeks.

As public support for the war wanes, Western leaders have criticised the government of President Hamid Karzai -- returned this week for another five years -- for lack of action on corruption.

But the foreign ministry in Kabul hit back on Saturday, saying comments by the UN special representative, British Prime Minister Gordon Brown and others that Karzai must pursue clean government policies were disrespectful.

"Over the last few days some political and diplomatic circles and propaganda agencies of certain foreign countries have intervened in Afghanistan's internal affairs by issuing instructions concerning the composition of Afghan government organs and political policy," it said.

"Such instructions have violated respect for Afghanistan's national sovereignty."

Separately, the Afghan army said a five-day operation that ended on Friday in northern Kunduz province had resulted in the deaths of 133 (alleged Taliban fighters).

The Afghan army said at least three Afghan soldiers and more than a dozen (alleged Taliban fighters) were killed on Saturday in southern Afghanistan.

An Afghan army convoy was struck by a roadside bomb in Girishk district of troubled Helmand province killing three Afghan troopers, southern military corps commander General Shair Mohammad Zazai told AFP.

In neighbouring Zabul province a joint operation by Afghan and foreign forces in Naw Bahar district killed 18 (alleged) Taliban fighters, he said.

As Taliban activity across Afghanistan intensifies, UN chief Ban Ki-moon said about 200 UN expatriate staff would be temporarily relocated outside Afghanistan in the wake of a deadly rebel attack on a guesthouse on October 28 which killed five UN workers.

UN officials said another 400 expatriates were being relocated to safer sites within Afghanistan.





Fair Use Notice

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

 

 

 

 

Opinions expressed in various sections are the sole responsibility of their authors and they may not represent ccun.org.

editor@ccun.org