Al-Jazeerah: Cross-Cultural Understanding

 

News, September 2009

 
www.ccun.org

www.aljazeerah.info

Al-Jazeerah History

Archives 

Mission & Name  

Conflict Terminology  

Editorials

Gaza Holocaust  

Gulf War  

Isdood 

Islam  

News  

News Photos  

Opinion Editorials

US Foreign Policy (Dr. El-Najjar's Articles)  

 

 

 

Editorial Note: The following news reports are summaries from original sources. They may also include corrections of Arabic names and political terminology. Comments are in parentheses.

 

Scrapping Bush-Era EU Missile Shield Sweeps Obstacles to Resetting Russian-US Ties

 

Russian Pres says Moscow notes Obama's statement on ABM in Europe

17.09.2009, 21.32

MOSCOW, September 17, 2009, (Itar-Tass) -

Russia has noticed U.S. President Barack Obama's statement on a readjustment of his country's approach to the problem of deployment of elements of the U.S. national antiballistic missiles system, President Dmitry Medvedev said Thursday night.

"I discussed the issue with President Obama in the course of our talks in London and Moscow and we came to an agreement then and fixed it in our joint statements that Russia and the U.S. will work together to assess the risks of missile technologies worldwide proliferation," he said.

"The statement made in Washington earlier today shows that favorable enough conditions are taking shape for the work of this kind," Medvedev said.

"Quite naturally, experts will yet have to hold precisely-targeted consultations and this country is ready for them," he said.

"In any case, President Obama and I will have a fair opportunity to exchange opinions on all aspects of strategic stability, including the antiballistic missiles system, in the course of a meeting due in New York September 23," Medvedev said. "I hope we'll be able to give instructions to the appropriate departments after it on stepping up bilateral interaction that will embrace European and other interested states at later stages."

"We'll design efficacious measures of counteraction to missile risks together and will ensure equal security for all countries on the European continent," Medvedev said.

He praised the U.S. President's responsible approach to our agreements, adding: "I'm ready for further dialogue."

Scrapping Missile Shield Sweeps Obstacles to Resetting Russian-US Ties

2009-09-18 22:48:26  

    by Xinhua writers Hai Yang, Yu Maofeng

    MOSCOW, Sept. 18 (Xinhua) --

The end of the U.S.'s European missile shield plan has been welcomed in Russia, setting the scene for a thaw in recent frosty relations between the two.

    U.S. President Barack Obama announced Thursday the U.S. would abandon a Bush-era missile defense shield program while initiating a "phased, adaptive approach" of the plan in Eastern Europe.

    The decision so far has been greatly appreciated by Russian media and analysts, who say it has cleared away one of the major obstacles for the resetting of relations between the two countries.

    RUSSIA WELCOMES U.S. SHELVING OF PLAN

    The missile plan and Russia's five-day war with Georgia in August last year resulted in Russian-U.S. relations plunging under the administration of Obama's predecessor George W. Bush to their lowest level since the Cold War.

    The Bush administration planned to deploy 10 missile interceptors in Poland and a radar system in the Czech Republic as part of its European missile shield to protect its European allies from missile threats from "rogue states."

    After Obama assumed office, Russia and the United States have both expressed willingness to improve their ties, yet key divergences on major issues of interest, including the missile defense plan, have impeded the pace of this "reset" process.

    Despite repeated assurances from the Obama administration that the missile defense plan was not targeted at Russia, Moscow had remained staunchly opposed to the plan, regarding it as a major threat to its national security.

    Russian President Dmitry Medvedev last year even threatened to install short-range Iskander missiles in its western Kaliningrad enclave to "neutralize" the perceived threat.

    However, hours after Obama announced the abandonment of the missile defense plan on Thursday, Medvedev welcomed the decision in a televised speech, saying it had created a fairly good environment for joint assessment of global missile proliferation risks.

    "We value the responsible approach of the U.S. president to our agreement. I am ready to continue our dialogue," said Medvedev, referring to their discussions during Obama's July visit to Moscow and their first meeting in London early April.

    Medvedev also hoped the two countries could jointly devise missile non-proliferation measures, and said he would discuss with his U.S. counterpart relevant issues during their meeting in New York on Sept. 23.

    Also on Friday, Russian Prime Minister Vladimir Putin hailed the U.S. decision as "correct and brave."

    REASONS BEHIND THE REVAMP

    According to Obama, the policy shift was guided by two principal factors: intelligence assessments of Iran's missile programs and "specific and proven advances" in U.S. missile defense technology.

    "The best way to responsibly advance our security and the security of our allies is to deploy a missile defense system that best responds to the threats that we face and that utilizes technology that is both proven and cost-effective," Obama said.

    He also said the new missile defense architecture would provide "stronger, smarter and swifter defenses" for the United States and its allies.

    However, according to Russian analysts long-awaiting such an announcement, there are two pragmatic reasons for the United States to shelve the missile defense plan.

    The first would be the tremendous expense of implementing the program, which also would demand a very long-term commitment of resources for development, said an article on the Russian Profile website.

    "A workable missile defense system does not yet exist," said Fyodor Lukyanov, editor in chief of the foreign policy journal Russia in Global Affairs.

    "To take political risks for a system that does not exist so far was probably not seen as the best way forward," he said.

    Alexander Pikayev, a senior disarmament expert, was quoted by the RIA Novosti news agency as saying the decision was due to internal U.S. debate as well as its slashing of its military budget amid the ongoing global recession.

    The second reason would be the questionable strategic value of the program.

    "It wouldn't cover the whole territory of Europe, and even from the American point of view, the location was not ideal," said Oksana Antonenko of the International Institute for Strategic Studies.

    Antonenko said the strategic debate had already shifted to installing systems closer to Iran.

    "Israel, or possibly Turkey ... There are areas where missile systems with existing capabilities would make more sense," he said.

    RECIPROCAL CONCESSION?

    The U.S. decision to overhaul its missile defense system is widely seen as part of a broader U.S. effort to reset ties with Russia as the White House is looking for cooperation on dealing with challenges such as the financial crisis, proliferation, climate change and terrorism.

    Taking into account Russia's firm position to link a new nuclear arms reduction treaty to the U.S. missile shield, the U.S. decision to scrap its anti-missile plans would pave the way for working out a replacement for the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START I), which was signed in 1991 between the United States and the Soviet Union and is due to expire in December.

    Negotiators from both countries might now be able to reach consensus at the nuclear arms talks, said Pavel Zolotaryov, deputy director of the Institute of U.S. and Canadian Studies, a Russian think tank.

    They may also be able to move ahead on plans to establish information exchange centers in Brussels and Moscow that would monitor the globe and alert NATO members and Russia of missile launches, Zolotaryov said.

    Obama's shift has drawn sharp criticism at home as a weak-kneed capitulation to Russia and an abandonment of U.S. allies, but Russia may not regard it as a "concession" so much as a return to "common sense."

    Some analysts believe the U.S. move will not win Washington support from Moscow over Iran, which is developing its own nuclear program that it insists is for peaceful purposes.

    Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov reiterated Thursday that Moscow opposes U.S. efforts to impose extra sanctions on Iran over its nuclear program.

    Nevertheless, there are signs that the Kremlin might cooperate with Washington on Iran's nuclear issue.

    Medvedev on Tuesday told Russia experts from the Valdai international discussion club that Moscow would act "openly and in a responsible way" in resolving the Iranian nuclear problem.

    "Sanctions are not very effective, but sometimes we are forced to impose sanctions," he said.

    Moscow also offered an olive branch to Washington during Obama's visit to Moscow early July, when Russia allowed the transit of U.S. military cargos to Afghanistan across its territory, bypassing the troubled Pakistan.

    In response to the U.S. decision to scrap its missile shield plans, a high-ranking Russian military official said Friday that Moscow could drop plans to station tactical missiles in its Balticexclave.

Editor: Mu Xuequan

U.S. unveils new missile defense program in Europe

2009-09-17 22:41:34  

·Obama abandoned the Bush-era controversial missile defense shield program in Eastern Europe. ·He unveiled a "phased, adaptive approach" for missile defense in the continent. ·The Pentagon suggests four-phase deployment of the missile defense systems from 2011 to 2020.

    WASHINGTON, Sep. 17 (Xinhua) --

U.S. President Barack Obama on Thursday announced abandonment of the Bush-era controversial missile defense shield program in Eastern Europe, but unveiled a "phased, adaptive approach" for missile defense in the continent.

    "This new approach will provide capabilities sooner, build on proven systems and offer greater defenses against the threat of missile attack than the 2007 European missile defense program," Obama said at a brief news conference in the White House.

    Based on an assessment of Iran's missile threat and U.S. advanced and cost-effective missile defense technologies, the Pentagon suggests the four-phase deployment of the missile defense systems in Europe from 2011 to 2020.

    In Phase One (in the 2011 time frame), the United States would deploy current and proven missile defense systems, including the sea-based Aegis Weapon System, the SM-3 interceptor (Block IA), and sensors such as the forward-based Army Navy/Transportable Radar Surveillance system.

    In Phase Two (in the 2015 timeframe), the United States would deploy a more capable version of the SM-3 interceptor (Block IB) in both sea- and land-based configurations, and more advanced sensors, to expand the defended area against short- and medium-range missile threats.

    In Phase Three (in the 2018 timeframe), the United States would deploy the more advanced SM-3 Block IIA variant currently under development, to counter short-, medium-, and intermediate-range missile threats.

    In Phase Four (in the 2020 timeframe), the United States would deploy the SM-3 Block IIB to help better cope with medium- and intermediate-range missiles and the potential future ICBM threat to the United States.

    The "phased and adaptive" approach, according to the Pentagon, would sustain U.S. homeland defense against long-range ballistic missile threats, speed protection of U.S. deployed forces, civilian personnel, and their accompanying families against the near-term missile threat from Iran.

    Obama's predecessor George W. Bush and his administration planned to deploy 10 missile interceptors in Poland and a radar system in the Czech Republic as part of its European missile shield, in a so-called prevention its European allies from missile threat by "rouge state."

    Russia strongly opposes the deployment, saying it poses threat to its security.

    Looking for Russia's cooperation on dealing with challenges, such as financial crisis, proliferation, climate change, terrorism, the Obama administration has vowed to "press the reset button" with Moscow through more bilateral strategic cooperation and conversation.

    However, like his predecessor, President Obama still stresses missile threat from Iran, reiterates the necessity of missile defense deployment in Europe.

    "President Bush was right that Iran's ballistic missile program poses a significant threat. And that's why I'm committed to deploying strong missile defense systems which are adaptable to the threats of the 21st century," said Obama.

    According to Obama, the policy shift was guided by two principal factors: intelligence assessment of Iran's missile programs and "specific and proven advances" in U.S. missile defense technology.

    "The best way to responsibly advance our security and the security of our allies is to deploy a missile defense system that best responds to the threats that we face and that utilizes technology that is both proven and cost-effective," said the president, who said the new missile defense architecture will provide "stronger, smarter and swifter defenses" for the United States and its allies.

    Obama's spokesman Robert Gibbs has denied the linkage between abandoning missile defense programs in the Czech Republic and Poland and Washington's attempt to ease relations with Russia.

Editor: Mu Xuequan




Fair Use Notice

This site contains copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic, democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml. If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the copyright owner.

 

 

 

 

Opinions expressed in various sections are the sole responsibility of their authors and they may not represent ccun.org.

editor@ccun.org