| 
 The Anti-Iran Campaign:
 Détente or Hidden Agendas? A sign of The 
			Times  By Gilad Atzmon ccun.org, July 22, 2008
  Back in 2003 
			I wrote, “If ‘world peace’ is our main concern, we must achieve 
			a balance of power, we must let the oppressed people of this world 
			have access to the most advanced weaponry…. Balance of power is the 
			only key to peace.” Nowadays, when Israel and its supportive lobbies 
			are doing everything within their powers to drag us all into a third 
			world war, I find it necessary to say it again. The only way to 
			spare the Middle East and the entire world from another devastating 
			cycle of bloodshed is to let the Iranians have their nuclear toy. 
			But it goes even further, seemingly, the only way to save the Jewish 
			state from its merciless parade of belligerent omnipotence is to let 
			Iran join the nuclear club ASAP. The only thing that may cool down 
			the Zionist militant genocidal enthusiasm is an overwhelming Iranian 
			might of deterrence.
 But it isn’t only Iran. The only possible way to bring peace to 
			the region is to equip Syria, the Hezbollah and the Hamas with the 
			exact weaponry that would help make the Israelis think twice. As 
			much as the Israelis love to punish their enemies they really hate 
			to pay the ultimate price. Once the Israelis become aware of the 
			clear possibility of their own destruction, they may rapidly develop 
			some real inclination towards peace and reconciliation. Yet, we have to remember that Israel is not alone in this lethal 
			game. According to the Sunday 
			Times, “President George W Bush has told the Israeli government 
			that he may be prepared to approve a future military strike on an 
			Iranian nuclear plant…Despite the opposition of his own generals and 
			widespread skepticism that America is ready to risk the military, 
			political and economic consequences of an airborne strike on Iran, 
			the president has given an ‘amber light’ to an Israeli plan to 
			attack Iran’s main nuclear sites with long-range bombing sorties”. Seemingly, we are not in any shortage of lunatics. For more than 
			a while, we are fully aware that the road from Jerusalem to 
			Washington is a soaking red route. However, there is something 
			rather faulty or even amusing in the western argument for a war. 
			According to our western analysts, President Ahmadinejad is really 
			unpopular amongst his people and he is on his way out. The Sunday 
			Times’ editorial informed 
			us yesterday that: “Last year a Tehran website poll of 20,000 people 
			found that 62.5% of those who voted for him (Ahmadinejad) in 2005 
			would not do so in next year’s presidential election.” I am slightly 
			puzzled. If this is indeed the case, if the Iranian president is 
			politically ruined, why are we so keen to initiate another world 
			war? Wouldn’t it be better to wait for a few months and let this 
			Ahmadinejad be ousted by his own people? Apparently, The Sunday 
			Times and our very many Neocons do not believe their own lies. In its editorial The Sunday Times tries to give the impression 
			that Ahmadinejad is taking his people into war just to divert the 
			attention from his policy that is failing at home. “With inflation 
			running at an estimated 14% and one-third of the population 
			unemployed, Ahmadinejad’s goal of ‘putting the petroleum income on 
			people’s tables’ is as distant as ever.“ I would be rather suspicious about the Sunday Times’ reading of 
			Iranian current internal affairs as much as I was suspicious of the 
			paper’s reading of Iraqi WMD situation. However, I better admit it, 
			I do not live in Iran. In fact, I live in the West, in London if to 
			be specific. And it is actually in London where I see a growing 
			dismay having to do with very cloudy financial predictions. It is in 
			London where I read about the collapse of major western financial 
			institutions. It is in London where I detect a growing recession and 
			a threat of financial depression. I ask myself whether The Times’ faulty reading of Ahmadinejad is 
			nothing but a banal projection? I assume that this is indeed the 
			case. In fact it is the other way around. It is our western leaders 
			who are failing to provide for their constituencies and citizens. It 
			is our Western leaders who are taking us to wars just to cover their 
			disastrous malfunctioning.  It is our western leaders who are about to initiate a world war 
			just to whitewash the collapse of the western capitalistic dream. One has to be blind not to see it all. http://www.gilad.co.uk 
			http://www.myspace.com/giladaztmon
 
			
			http://palestinethinktank.com/2008/07/15/detente-or-hidden-agendas-a-sign-of-the-times-by-gilad-atzmon/
 
   |