Obama Mania
      
		
        By Stephen Lendman
		ccun.org, November 12, 2008
		
 
On November 4, the world exhaled. The age of George Bush 
		ended, and a new one under Barak Obama began. With high hopes he'll 
		reverse the toxic legacy of the past eight years. Adopt socially 
		progressive policies. End foreign wars. Govern the nation responsibly,  
		democratically for all its people. Show his supporters that their faith 
		in him was justified. 
 
"Let us congratulate ourselves on being 
		alive at such a promising moment," wrote The Nation magazine's William 
		Greider. His victory is "a monumental rebuke to tragic history -- the 
		ultimate defeat of 'while supremacy.' Barak Obama has already changed 
		this nation profoundly. Like King before him, the man is a great and 
		brave teacher. (He) redefined the country for us."
 
The Nation 
		endorsed Obama early on and called his candidacy "historic (for) a new 
		generation (with) new possibilities....a sea-change of course (for) 
		progressive-driven reform....(the) end of the Reagan era....an end of 
		the occupation of Iraq....empowering labor (and) challenging our trade 
		policies." A socially liberal new beginning.
 
A "transformational 
		presidency," according to its editor Katrina Vanden Heuvel. A "new era 
		of possibility opened up by Barak Obama's victory. (His) team's respect 
		for the core decency, dignity and intelligence of the American people 
		was reflected in the campaign's" rhetoric. He represents "a historic 
		opportunity for a progressive governing agenda and a mandate for bold 
		action....Tonight we celebrate."
 
Early on, The Nation 
		shamelessly endorsed Obama with over-hyped expectations for him. They're 
		unfounded, and based on early indications, hold the cheers. Obama's 
		transition team is the first sign of the type people he'll choose for 
		cabinet and other top posts. Insiders all, including former Clinton 
		administration figures. The usual cast of characters in Democrat or 
		Republican administrations. The parts nearly interchangeable for their 
		common agenda. Progressive? A new beginning? A "mandate for bold 
		action?" A reason to "celebrate?" Indeed so for insiders, who engineered 
		what's now apparent.
 
Earlier this writer imagined it, but who 
		then could have known. In a July article titled A Possible September 
		Surprise," it was suggested that "Republicans may stick with a likely 
		loser, someone many insiders dislike, go for a 1976 repeat, turn things 
		over to a Democrat, let him deal with their mess, then retake the 
		presidency next time around." 
 
In the 1970s, the Rockefellers 
		(America's most powerful family) chose Jimmy Carter for president after 
		the turbulent Nixon years. Gerald Ford went along as window dressing. 
		The same process repeated in 2008 to decompress after eight toxic Bush 
		years. A needed respite for the country, the world, and humanity. A new 
		party and face to appear different from the old one. Who better chosen 
		than the first black president (a stroke of genius some believe) to 
		deflect attention from the past and focus it all on him and the task he 
		faces.
 
McCain-Palin was the vehicle. A perfect foil. A 
		caricature-like ticket. An embarrassment. Supremely unqualified on both 
		ends. By a man with a distinct "passion gap" for conservatives. Known 
		mostly for his unpredictable temperament, unimpressive intellect, 
		instability, and genius for making enemies in his own party. And a woman 
		more knowledgeable about fishing than affairs of state. Pulled from 
		obscurity. Noted only for having been chosen. Now consigned to a 
		footnote in history. One conservatives plan to forget, then erase.
 
		Now a new beginning under Obama. With hoped for change that he promised. 
		A "bold mandate (for) progressive governing." A "transformational 
		presidency." The end of neoliberalism and new era for his faithful. With 
		legions lining up to cheer. Unmindful of how American politics works. 
		The way it is most everywhere. The same old, same old that The New York 
		Times ignored in saying that "Obama began moving (swiftly) to build his 
		administration and make good on his ambitious promises to point the US 
		in a different direction...."
 
Without a whiff of progressivism 
		in any high-level appointees so far named, suggested, or in his 
		transition team co-chairmen:
 
John Podesta
 
From 1998 - 
		2001, he was Clinton's chief of staff, and in the 1980s, served as legal 
		counsel for various congressional committees. He's the founder and 
		current president of the Center for American Progress, a Democrat party 
		front group claiming progressive credentials that got seed money from 
		investor and Obama advisor Warren Buffett. He's also a visiting law 
		professor at Georgetown University Law Center, and since 1988 the head 
		of the Podesta Group, a Washington-based lobbying firm representing 
		corporations like Lockheed Martin, BP, and Walmart as well as trade 
		associations among its other clients. The Washingtonian magazine ranked 
		him the third most powerful city lobbyist.
 
Valerie Jarrett
 
		A Chicagoan who worked for Mayor Harold Washington in the 1980s as 
		Deputy Corporation Counsel for Finance and Development. She then moved 
		on to the Daley administration in the 1990s as deputy chief of staff and 
		in other positions. She's currently CEO of the Habitat Company, a real 
		estate development and management firm with a dubious record. She works 
		closely with city officials on public housing and helped the Chicago 
		Housing Authority get public subsidies for its notoriously substandard 
		work. 
 
Habitat managed Grove Parc Plaza from 2001 - 2008 and an 
		even larger complex that the federal government seized in 2006 because 
		of its dilapidated and uninhabitable state. Nonetheless, she's rumored 
		to become the new housing secretary where she may do for the country 
		what she did to Chicago.
 
Jarrett is also a Board member of the 
		Chicago Stock Exchange where she served as chairman from 2004 - 2007. 
		She's one of Obama's most trusted and longest serving advisors and 
		campaign aides.
 
Pete Rouse 
 
He's a long-time Capitol 
		Hill insider for over 30 years. Once served as Senate majority leader 
		Tom Daschle's chief of staff and was known as "the 101st senator" 
		because of his knowledge, skill and contacts. He's been allied to Obama 
		since 2004. Wrote his "Strategic Plan" for his first year in the Senate 
		and also served as his chief of staff.
 
All three individuals are 
		expected to have key roles in the new administration once it takes over 
		in January as well as others on the Transition Project. It's been around 
		for months as a fund-raising front. The Chicago Sun Times said it was to 
		raise money from individual donors up to a maximum $5000 and do no 
		internet or direct mail solicitations. It helped Obama raise $600 
		million for his campaign, and though he claimed transparency as one of 
		his principles, he made no "voluntary early disclosures." Money raised 
		is also being used for his transition period with no mention of how 
		he'll use any residual amounts.
 
Other Transition Project Members
		 
Carol Browner
 
She served as Administrator of the 
		Environmental Protection Agency for eight years under Bill Clinton. The 
		longest of anyone in that position. Earlier she worked for Citizen 
		Action in Washington. As general counsel for the Florida House of 
		Representatives Government Operations Committee and for Senator Lawton 
		Chiles. In addition, as Senator Al Gore's Legislative Director. In 2001, 
		she joined the Albright Group, a global strategy firm headed by former 
		secretary of state Madeleine Albright.
 
William Daley
 
		Brother of Chicago mayor Richard M. Daley. He's a lawyer and was 
		Clinton's secretary of commerce from 1997 - 2000. He's a well-connected 
		insider and member of numerous high-powered organizations like the 
		Council on Foreign Relations, Friends of Hillary, Friends of Joe 
		Lieberman, Obama for America, and a number of corporate boards. 
		Companies like Boeing, Abbott Labs, Merck and Boston Properties. He's 
		also vice-chairman of Evercore Partners, a 1996-founded investment 
		banking "boutique providing advisory services to prominent multinational 
		corporations on significant mergers, acquisitions, divestitures, 
		restructuring, and other strategic corporate transactions."
 
In 
		the Clinton administration, Daley was instrumental in getting NAFTA 
		passed. He's also a past president of SBC Communications and was later 
		Midwest chairman of JP Morgan Bank among other positions, including the 
		practice of law.
 
Michael Froman
 
He's president and CEO 
		of CitiInsurance, a branch of banking giant Citigroup. Also a senior 
		fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations and a Resident Fellow at the 
		German Marshall Fund of the United States. Earlier and in the Clinton 
		administration, he served as treasury department chief of staff from 
		1977 to 1999. From 1993 - 1995, he was director for International 
		Affairs on the National Economic Council and the National Security 
		Council at the White House.
 
Federico Pena
 
He held two 
		cabinet posts under Bill Clinton - from 1993 - 1997 as transportation 
		secretary and from 1997 - 1998 as energy secretary. In 1992, he advised 
		then governor Clinton on transportation issues. Since 1998, he's been 
		affiliated with the investment firm, Vestar Capital Partners, as senior 
		advisor and is now one of its managing directors.
 
Suggested 
		Obama Administration Members
 
The first already chosen as Obama's 
		chief of staff - Rahm Emanuel, but hold the cheers. He's an influential 
		insider and Democrat member of the House since 2003. In 1991, he joined 
		the Clinton campaign as a fundraiser. Then later was political director 
		and senior advisor.
 
From 1999 - 2002, he was a managing director 
		for investment bank Dresdner, Kleinwort, Wasserstein in Chicago and also 
		served as mayor Richard Daley's chief fundraiser.
 
In 2006, he 
		chaired the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee for the midterm 
		elections. He's the fourth ranking House Democrat. A hawk, neoliberal 
		and pro-Israeli hardliner. Now deceased long-time Chicago activist, 
		investigative reporter, and founder and chairman of the Citizens 
		Committee to Clean up the Courts, Sherman Skolnick, called him the 
		"acting deputy chief for North America of the (Israeli intelligence) 
		Mossad."
 
He's the son of Benjamin Emanuel (changed from Auerbach 
		in 1936 by his grandfather Ezekiel), a Chicago pediatrician involved 
		pre-1948 with smuggling weapons to the Irgun. The Israeli group former 
		prime minister Menachem Begin headed that in 1946 bombed the King David 
		Hotel and conducted numerous other terrorist attacks. 
 
Emanuel 
		is hard line like his father in his one-sided support for Israel. He's 
		dismissive of pro-Palestinian sympathies, and supports a failed peace 
		process that guarantees no chance for one. In 1991, he served as a 
		civilian volunteer in the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) during the Gulf 
		war and is believed to hold dual citizenships. 
 
The Nation 
		magazine's David Corn praised his appointment and called Emanuel "an 
		intelligent, fierce, competent, and sharp Washington partisan....an 
		agent of change....and guy who gets things done." Corn also hailed 
		Obama's victory and called him "one of the most progressive (or liberal) 
		nominees in the Democratic Party's recent history." Looking ahead to his 
		presidency, he represents "hope and change. He opposed the Iraq 
		war....Bush's tax cuts for the rich. He was no advocate of let-'er-rip, 
		free market capitalism or American unilateralism. In policy terms, Obama 
		represents a serious course correction....And more."
 
In fact, 
		Obama is mostly opposite of what Corn suggests. On financial and 
		economic matters alone, his Transitional Economic Advisory Board reveals 
		it. All its 17 members are high-level corporate and financial types plus 
		Democrat party insiders. CEOs like Warren Buffet, Robert Rubin and head 
		of four major corporations Penny Pritzker with more about her below 
		regarding her dubious business dealings and influential role in an Obama 
		administration. His other Brain Trust members (as the Wall Street 
		Journal calls them) are:
 
-- Roel Campos - former SEC 
		commissioner;
 
-- Daniel Tarullo - Georgetown University 
		professor and former deputy director for international affairs of the 
		National Economic Council (NEC) from 1993 - 1998;
 
-- Eric 
		Schmidt - CEO of Google;
 
-- Antonio Villaraigosa - mayor of Los 
		Angeles;
 
-- William Donaldson - former SEC chairman, under 
		secretary of state, chairman and CEO of the New York Stock Exchange, CEO 
		of Aetna, and founder and head of the investment firm Donaldson, Lufkin 
		& Jenrette;
 
-- Laura Tyson - former chairman of the National 
		Economic Council (NEC);
 
-- David Bonier - former congressman;
		 
-- vice president-elect Joe Biden;
 
-- Jennifer Granholm - 
		governor of Michigan;
 
-- Paul Volker - former Fed chairman with 
		more on him below;
 
-- Rahm Emanuel - congressman and incoming 
		White House chief of staff; it's the most important administration post 
		after the president and a Dick Cheney type vice-presidency;
 
-- 
		Richard Parsons - chairman of Time Warner;
 
-- Anne Mulcahy - CEO 
		of Xerox;
 
-- Lawrence Summers - former Treasury secretary with 
		more on him below;
 
-- Roger Ferguson - CEO of TIAA-CREF 
		financial services;
 
--John Podesta - transition team head;
 
		-- Robert Reich - former labor secretary; and
 
-- William Daley - 
		former commerce secretary.
 
Noticeably absent - anyone 
		representing ordinary people. Workers, homeowners, the unemployed, the 
		disadvantaged, the poor who've been hurt the most by Wall 
		Street's-caused financial crisis now morphed into the worst economic 
		downturn since the Great Depression. Their omission is clear evidence 
		where Obama's administration is headed, where his allegiance lies, and 
		what his policy directives will look like. A rigid class society, white 
		supremacism, and neoliberalism are safe in his hands.
 
-- he's 
		for permanent occupation of Iraq;
 
-- America's imperial agenda;
		 
-- militarism and foreign wars;
 
-- new ones against 
		Pakistan; possibly Iran as well;
 
-- an enlarged military;
 
		-- more troops to Afghanistan;
 
-- a new Cold War with Russia;
		 
-- in 2006, campaigned for Joe Lieberman against anti-war candidate 
		Ned Lemont;
 
-- opposes impeaching Bush and Cheney;
 
-- in 
		July 2005, backed reauthorizing the Patriot Act with its police state 
		provisions;
 
-- supports Homeland Security funding to enforce 
		them;
 
-- supports the death penalty;
 
-- privatized in 
		lieu of public education;
 
-- is one-sidedly pro-Israel;
 
		-- opposes universal single-payer national health care;
 
--  
		supports medical providers in wrongful injury cases;
 
-- backs 
		"free trade" and initiatives like NAFTA;
 
-- the right of mining 
		companies to strip mine everything;
 
-- is unresponsive to labor;
		 
-- supports biofuels production, big agribusiness subsidies, and 
		the industry's rage to make all foods GMO;
 
-- supports the Bush 
		administration's energy policy; its huge subsidies and other generous 
		handouts;
 
-- backs nuclear power, loose industry regulation, and 
		multi-billions in subsidies;
 
-- supports the Paulson bailout 
		plan and the fraudsters that get it; 
 
-- backs repressive 
		immigration legislation affecting people of color;
 
-- is 
		beholden to his corporate backers; and
 
-- is committed to a 
		pro-business agenda overall.
 
He steered clear of criticizing 
		Wall Street, and appears ready to back down on his campaign pledge to 
		cut taxes for earners under $200,000 and raise them on incomes over 
		$250,000. When asked point blank, he waffled and said this policy may be 
		reconsidered, which is clear evidence it's been scrubbed.
 
He's 
		reputed not to be a member of the far-to-the-right-of-center Democratic 
		Leadership Council (DLC), but according to its founder, Al From, he's on 
		board for "a good part of the strategy we have articulated over the 
		years." He added that Obama has an "intellectual" and "tactical" 
		connection to the DLC. It was clear in his first appointment - Rahm 
		Emanuel.
 
He's a key DLC member in good standing. The 
		organization Ralph Nader calls "corporatist (and) soulless." Governing 
		from the far right no different than Republicans. Founded in 1985, it 
		grew dominant in the party under then governor Clinton and Senators 
		Gore, Lieberman and John Breaux.
 
Its ideology is anti-labor, 
		anti-populist, anti-welfare, pro-business, and very amenable to 
		imperialism, militarism, and foreign wars. Again Ralph Nader: "To the 
		DLC mind, Democrats are catering to 'special interests' when they stand 
		up for trade unions, regulatory consumer-investor protections, a 
		pre-emptive peace policy overseas, pruning the bloated military budget 
		now devouring (the federal budget), defending Social Security from Wall 
		Street schemes, and pressing for universal health care coverage. So 
		right-wing is the DLC....that even opposing Bush's tax cuts for the 
		wealthy....is considered ultra-liberal and contrary to winning 
		campaigns."
 
DLC "special interests" include the rights of 
		blacks, Hispanics, Latino immigrants, Muslims, labor, the poor, consumer 
		justice groups, populism, progressivism,  environmental protection, 
		anti-war activists, peace supporters, groups demanding corporate and war 
		criminals be prosecuted, and anyone believing that America should have 
		honest elections and be governed democratically. 
 
Based on early 
		indications, these "interests" appear sidelined in a new Obama 
		administration. But not according to New York Times columnist Bob 
		Herbert in his "Take a Bow, America" article. "The nation deserves to 
		take (one). This is not the same place it used to be."
 
In his 
		latest Times commentary, our newest economics Nobel laureate, Paul 
		Krugman, agreed in calling November 4 "a date that will live in fame. If 
		the election of our first African-American president didn't stir you, if 
		it didn't leave you teary-eyed and proud of your country, there's 
		something wrong with you. But will the election also mark a turning 
		point in the actual substance of policy? Can Barak Obama really usher in 
		a new era of progressive policies? Yes he can."
 
Times writer 
		Frank Rich agreed as well in his article titled "It Still Felt Good the 
		Morning After (as) America's tears of catharsis gave way to 
		unadulterated joy....millions of....Americans were....waiting for a 
		leader. This was the week that they reclaimed their country." 
 
		It will await a future one before they realize they were fooled again. 
		The nation will remain in safe elitist hands. It won't get "a new New 
		Deal" Krugman advocates given the names being floated to serve in it who 
		seem to have passed under the radar screens of the above commentators.
		 
Tom Daschle
 
The former Senate majority leader. Now a 
		special policy advisor at the Alston & Bird law firm and visiting 
		professor at Georgetown University's Public Policy Institute. He's also 
		a senior fellow at John Podesta's Center for American Progress. Possible 
		posts mentioned include secretary of state, health and human resources 
		for his work on health care, and agriculture for the same reason.
 
		Richard Holbrooke
 
Another long-time insider. He twice served as 
		assistant secretary of state. From 1977 - 1981 under Jimmy Carter for 
		Asia and from 1994 - 1996 for Europe under Bill Clinton. From 1993 - 
		1994, he was ambassador to Germany, and from 1999 - 2001 served as UN 
		ambassador. It's rumored he's being considered for secretary of state, a 
		position he failed to get to replace Warren Christopher when Madeleine 
		Albright got the job as the first ever woman in it.
 
Richard 
		Lugar
 
A senior Republican senator and man, who as mayor of 
		Indianapolis in 1975, gave an impressive welcoming address to a group 
		assembled by this writer for an event unrelated to world or national 
		affairs. He's now served 30 years in the Senate where he's been chairman 
		of the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations from 1987 - 1995 and again 
		from 2003 - 2007. He's been mentioned as a possible secretary of state.
		 
Lawrence Summers
 
From 1982 - 1983, he served on the Reagan 
		administration's Council of Economic Advisors. Then in 1993 in the 
		Clinton administration as under-Treasury secretary for international 
		affairs and as Treasury secretary from 1999 - 2001. Earlier from 1991 - 
		1993, he was chief economist for the World Bank where he authored a 
		controversial memo stating that "the economic logic behind dumping a 
		load of toxic waste in the lowest wage country is impeccable and we 
		should face up to that." 
 
Summers was later president of Harvard 
		University from 2001 - 2006 where controversy again dogged him. For his 
		contentious relations with faculty members and for suggesting that the 
		presence of few women in upper-level science and math positions was 
		because of innate differences between men and women. The combination led 
		to his 2006 resignation.
 
He now teaches at Harvard's Kennedy 
		School of Government, is a consultant to Goldman Sachs, and is a 
		managing director of the DE Shaw & Company hedge fund. His name is being 
		floated as the leading candidate for Treasury secretary, and as Michel 
		Chossudovsky states: "Putting a Hedge Fund manager (with links to the 
		Wall Street financial establishment) in charge of the Treasury is 
		tantamount to putting the fox in charge of the chicken coup," and more 
		evidence that Obama plans the kind of business as usual that he pledged 
		to get rid of.
 
Jon Corzine
 
Former CEO of Goldman Sachs 
		who was forced out by the current Treasury secretary, Henry Paulson, in 
		a palace coup. He's now New Jersey governor and according to the New 
		Jersey Star-Ledger "is being actively vetted by the Obama transition 
		team as a possible candidate for Treasury secretary in the new 
		administration, two New Jersey Democrats familiar with the process said 
		(on November 5)....Neither Corzine nor his aides would respond to a 
		request for comment." 
 
Paul Volker
 
The former Fed 
		chairman from 1979 under Jimmy Carter and under Ronald Reagan until Alan 
		Greenspan replaced him in 1987. He's a key Obama economic advisor and 
		another possible Treasury secretary. Timothy Geithner, the New York Fed 
		chairman, is also being mentioned. He's allied with Henry Paulson and 
		worked closely with him on his bailout plan.
 
James Steinberg
		 
An academic and political advisor, he served as deputy National 
		Security Advisor to Bill Clinton in his second term. He's currently dean 
		of the Lyndon Johnson School of Public Affairs at the University of 
		Texas. He's reported most likely to become National Security Advisor.
		 
Senators John Kerry and Republican Chuck Hagel are mentioned as 
		possible secretary of state choices, and the AP reports that Kerry wants 
		the job. New Mexico governor Bill Richardson also who under Clinton was 
		energy secretary and UN ambassador but then broke with the Clintons to 
		support Obama.
 
Dennis Ross
 
The former State department 
		director for policy planning and special Middle East coordinator under 
		Clinton. Under Republicans and Democrats he's been instrumental in 
		shaping Middle East policy with an extreme pro-Israeli bias. He may do 
		it again under Obama or serve in another key role.
 
Susan Rice
		 
A National Security Council member and assistant secretary of State 
		under Clinton. Rumored to become UN ambassador.
 
Some observers 
		think the current defense secretary Robert Gates may stay on, but an 
		anonymous source close to Obama discounts it. Others mentioned include 
		John Hamre, a former deputy defense secretary from 1997 - 2000 and 
		current president of the far right Center for Strategic and 
		International Studies (CSIS) that specializes in crisis management and 
		"advancing (US) global interests." Senator Jack Reed's name is also 
		mentioned as well as Marine general and former NATO commander Jim Jones 
		and general Anthony Zinni when he's available in 2010.
 
Penny 
		Pritzker
 
According to some, she's the most powerful woman in 
		America. At the least one of them and one of the richest as heiress to a 
		portion of the Pritzker family fortune (believed in excess of $40 
		billion) and its grandfathered in (free from taxation) offshore trusts. 
		Hundreds of them for secrecy that were set up in the Caribbean by her 
		grandfather Abram.
 
Forbes magazine did a feature 2005 story on 
		her saying she "was chosen by her late uncle (and family patriarch) Jay 
		(Pritzker) to help oversee the family's vast portfolio of investments" 
		that includes Hyatt hotels, other real estate investments, and 40% of 
		the Marmon Group after 60% was sold to Warren Buffett for $4.5 billion.
		 
In its "Power of Penny Pritzker" article, Bloomberg called her the 
		"billionaire head of Barack Obama's fundraising machine (and) the person 
		to call when you want to 'get the job done,' says Warren Buffett," who's 
		had a long-standing business relationship with the family going back 
		decades. Today, it's with Penny, the multi-billion dollar fortune she 
		controls, and the enormous influence she wields in Washington as a 
		Democrat party insider and fund-raiser extraordinaire.
 
According 
		to Bloomberg, Penny gets much of the credit for getting Obama elected. 
		For "organizing the best-financed campaign in US history." For tapping 
		wealthy and first-time contributors through her influence, contacts, and 
		"no-nonsense" style.
 
Her controversial one also, according to 
		Fran Sweet, a retired Ameritech manager, who lost $100,000 in the failed 
		(suburban Chicago) Hinsdale-based Superior Bank that collapsed in 2001 
		with some $2.3 billion in assets. The result of poor lending practices, 
		sloppy bookkeeping, and likely fraud at a time Pritzker was on its Board 
		and in charge. 
 
Superior was a predatory lender very heavily 
		into subprime mortgages in the late 1990s. Pritzker was one of its 
		originators, and some call her the "subprime queen." The doyenne of 
		predatory lending that cost the FDIC $700 million and depositors $65 
		million. 
 
Fran Sweet for one. She calls the Pritzkers "crooks. 
		They don't care anything about people who spent their whole lives trying 
		to save." Many lost everything in Superior accounts in amounts over the 
		FDIC $100,000 limit.
 
Bloomberg reported controversy about 
		another Pritzker company - the credit reporting firm TransUnion. "It 
		controls the $3.3 billion market in equal shares with Atlanta-based 
		Equifax and Dublin-based Experian Group Ltd. After widespread consumer 
		complaints about shoddy service in the credit checking industry, the US 
		Congress passed legislation in 2003 that allowed people to get free 
		copies of credit reports so they could check for mistakes and block 
		information obtained from identity theft." 
 
"That same year, a 
		jury awarded Judy Thomas of Klamath Falls, Oregon, $5.3 million after 
		she claimed TransUnion took six years to correct a mistake in her credit 
		report." On appeal, it was reduced to $1.3 million.
 
Pritzker 
		will have a seat at the table in the new Obama administration. Not an 
		appointed one but powerfully behind the scenes. The accustomed role she 
		prefers in business and politics.
 
More on the Obama 
		Administration Taking Shape
 
Many other prominent current or 
		former Democrats will be chosen for the new administration. Possibly 
		some Republicans as well. In the coming days, names will be announced 
		and things will begin taking shape. But hold the cheers. They'll all be 
		insiders on the same page, committed to the same agenda. Tackling the 
		current financial/economic crisis as top priority plus continued 
		imperialism, militarism, corporatism, neoliberalism, and no more for the 
		public than urgencies and expediency dictate. 
 
The same failed 
		fundamentalism that's been around for decades with maybe some 
		(temporary) softening around the edges given the severity of the current 
		crisis. So dire it's impossible to avoid providing something in the form 
		of aid. Enough to constrain growing anger and maintain the fiction of a 
		progressive new era. Its arrival has been postponed for a date to be 
		named later under a leader who's yet to be chosen.
 
Obama's First 
		Order of Business
 
The "urgent priority" of the severe financial 
		crisis. What economist Nouriel Roubini calls "The Economic Mess and 
		Financial Disaster that Obama Will Inherit." A sign progressivism will 
		have to wait until it's arrested and cleared up. But no short-term fix 
		will do it. Perhaps not even a longer-term one given the extent of the 
		damage and no assurance new policy choices will improve on current 
		dubious ones.
 
Roubini believes that the nation is in more dire 
		straits than anything seen in decades. He calls it:
 
"the most 
		severe recession in 50 years; the worst financial and banking crisis 
		since the Great Depression; a ballooning fiscal deficit that may be as 
		high as a trillion dollars in 2009 and 2010." 
 
Given $2 trillion 
		in announced borrowing; around another $1.8 trillion in loans, 
		investments and commitments; and whatever fiscal stimulus is added this 
		year and next, the total looks to be much higher.
 
On top of a 
		"huge current account deficit; a financial system that is in a severe 
		crisis and where deleveraging is still occurring at a very rapid pace, 
		thus causing a worsening of the credit crunch; a household sector where 
		millions of (them) are insolvent, into negative equity territory and on 
		the verge of losing their homes; a serious risk of deflation as the 
		slack in goods, labor and commodity markets becomes deeper; the risk 
		that we will end in a deflationary liquidity trap as the Fed is fast 
		approaching the zero-bound constraint for the Fed Funds rate; the risk 
		of a severe debt deflation as the real value of nominal liabilities will 
		rise given price deflation while the value of financial assets is still 
		plunging. This is the bitter gift that the Bush administration has 
		bequeathed to Obama and the Democrats."
 
New macro data supports 
		the dire state of things. It's been "worse than awful: collapsing retain 
		sales and consumption, free fall in capex spending, sharply falling 
		production," employment as well, "housing still in free fall and home 
		prices bound to fall 40% from the peak, collapsing auto sales, forward 
		looking business and consumer confidence indicators dropping to 
		multi-decade lows, sharp surge in corporate defaults, a wrecked banking 
		and financial system that will have to be partially nationalized." 
 
		Overall the most daunting economic and financial challenges since FDR in 
		the Great Depression, and adding to it, the rest of the world as bad 
		off. Severe recession is hitting Europe, Japan and other advanced 
		countries. China risks a hard landing. So do many emerging economies. A 
		severe global recession and financial crisis are certain. We're already 
		in it despite some observers still in denial. Especially on its severity 
		and likely duration.
 
According to Roubini, "the US and global 
		recession train has left the station." The financial and banking one as 
		well. It will be long and severe for at least two years regardless of 
		the best of policy actions going forward. Stock market rallies are 
		deceptive. They're classic bear market ones. At a time when 2009 
		earnings projections are "delusional." Projected to rise 15% from 2008 
		when, if fact, they'll fall off sharply. Roubini thinks the S & P 500 
		could drop as low as 600 or over one-third lower than its 931 valuation 
		on November 7. And if things are worse than expected, 500 may be a 
		bottoming low. It's no exaggeration to say the downside risks are 
		significant at a time of severe economic contraction.
 
"The worst 
		is ahead of us rather than behind us." Beware of excessive optimism that 
		each time has been wrong. A severe meltdown possibility may have passed 
		but it's not out of the question if poor future policy choices are made. 
		That's for the new Obama team to avoid plus having to deal with whatever 
		else the Bush administration does in its final weeks. It's botched 
		things so badly up to now so there's no telling how much more piling on 
		they'll do into January. Whatever happens until then, they'll be no joy 
		in 2009, and no simple task for the ablest of appointees or assurance 
		that their best efforts will work.
 
Stephen Lendman 
		is a Research Associate of the Centre for Research on Globalization. He 
		lives in Chicago and can be reached at
		lendmanstephen@sbc  
		global.net. 
 
Also visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com 
		and listen to The Global Research News Hour on RepublicBroadcasting 
		Mondays from 11AM - 1PM US Central time for cutting-edge discussions of 
		world and national topics with distinguished guests. All programs are 
		archived for easy listening.
		 http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=10861
		
      
      
      
      Fair Use
      Notice
      This site contains copyrighted material the
      use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright
      owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance
      understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic,
      democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this
      constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for
      in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.
      Section 107, the material on this site is
      distributed without profit to those
      who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information
      for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
      If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of
      your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the
      copyright owner.