Mission & Name
US Foreign Policy (Dr. El-Najjar's Articles)
Given Freeman's Case, Will You Be Able To
Dismantle Israel's Nuclear Arsenal?
By Ali Al-Hail
ccun.org, April 14, 2009
Europe has apparently, excited
President Barak Obama so much. He dreamt so much in Europe , by
reportedly, surrounding himself, with babbles of a virtual reality.
Martin Luther King dreamt also. But, he had an intellectual dream. And his
dream came true, after four and a half decades. A Black president, now in
the White House. King was realistically, dreaming. I wonder, whether,
President Obama is as so.
As the euphoria of Europe,
and NATO's gathering settled, President Obama's call on the EU regarding
Turkey 's accession to the EU, while visiting Turkey was slammed right in
the face by President Sarkozy. The French president didn't wait too
long to respond. He rejected his NATO's alliance call, by maintaining
France 's rigid stand on Turkey 's membership.
presumes, as do many that, Sarkozy's pro-Israel stance, feed into this
trend, rather than the French accusation to Turkey about the 'alleged'
Armenian massacre by Turkey during WWI. In any case, Turkey is a
majority-Muslim country, whose leadership has recently, condemned Israel
's harshness in Gaza , while most Arab leaders remained aloof.
Had Turkey determined to utilize its many Arab\Muslim cards with the EU,
the EU would have crawled for Turkey , to join the EU. It's hoped that,
this French strictness has made Obama to calm down, and regret his virtual
reality dreaming in Europe .
that, President Obama, has not been taken seriously, by the Europeans for
his 'noticeably,' cynical views on global issues, and for his
conceivably,' weak personality before the US-based-Israeli Lobby. He, for
instance, who has shamefully, failed to appoint his preference, Richard
Freeman, for the post of National Intelligence Council, just because he
dared, and criticized Israel, how could he clear the World off nuclear
weapons. Forget about North Korea , and the others, will he be able to
dismantle Israel 's nuclear arsenals? That's the one trillion dollar
Only, days from his presidency,
his (I wonder, whether his or Israel 's) Secretary Of State, Hilary
Clinton, visited Israel . She stipulated clearly, yet once again, the US
long-lasting commitment to Israel 's "right to defend itself."
Clinton, didn't forget, of course, (does she dare?) to reinforce the ever
most notorious aspect of the US strategic relationships with Israel, as
being the "closest ally to Israel," despite the World widespread outcry
against Israel's unprecedented cruelty in Gaza.
Clinton's visit also, came nearly, two weeks, since Israel shocked the
World by its holocausts, genocides and massacres in Gaza . Has the World
heard a word of criticism from her to Israel ? No way. She knew that, had
she paid even a lip service (at least, to please the angry World) she
would've now, faced Freeman's fate.
mafia, and the Israeli Lobby in the US , are totally, intolerant with an
anti-Israel's sentiments. The Freeman's example has summed it up: The
United States Of America is long, ruled by the Israeli Lobby.
After all, Israel only, tested the DIME and the White phosphorus bombs, in
the flush and bones of Palestinian children, to find out how successful
the US apparently, new DIME death weapons were. And to see how US F16s-the
pride of US death industry- look and sound like, while dropping the DIME
and the phosphorus on the Palestinian children. In other words, Israel did
the US a favor!
Still, (as many presume, the Israeli
Lobby-installed-President Barak Obama,) kept dreaming while browsing
amongst Europeans, as a lost cloud in the middle of nowhere. He came up
with so many things, during his days of wonder. Obama, 'asserted' that,
"NATO is the strongest alliance in the World."
strongest", against whom? Since 1991, until the time of writing, NATO "the
strongest alliance in the World", literally, massacred nearly, 3 million
innocent people in Iraq and Afghanistan, injured many more and maimed
others, according to UN organizations, of which NATO member states are
part, and according to media reports, including those of the CNN's and the
BBC's. During the NATO's conference in Europe, President Obama focused on
Afghanistan , and almost nothing, but Afghanistan .
Obama, and his NATO's counterparts, know very well that, the Afghan
resistance defeated the British, and the former Soviet Union . IS he
really, serious that, by dispatching 17,000 more US troops to Afghanistan
, will defeat Taliban, and Al-Qaeda. Had it been this easy, George Bush's
administration, would have succeeded. For eight (8) years (since October
17th, 2001) up to January 2009, Taliban and Al-Qaeda have not just
survived the might of US-Led-NATO, but managed to dominate virtually, 80%
of Afghanistan .
Obama and Europe are extremely,
aware of the fact that, Bush administration with all its brutality, has
dramatically, failed in defeating Taliban or Al-Qaeda. On the contrary,
Bush administration, created even a much more bitter enemy, apart from
Taliban\Afghanistan-Taliban\Pakistan. Undoubtedly, this development has
made the US -Led-'war on terror', far more complex. It seems that, the US
has repeated the fatal blunder of its closest ally ' Israel '. During
Israel 's 1982 invasion of Lebanon , while it managed to clear South
Lebanon off the Palestinian resistance, Israel was stunned by the
emergence of even far much more bitter enemy of Hizbullah.
So, what has occurred now, to make Obama sure
that, he could root out Talban and al-Qaeda. As a matter of fact, Taliban
and al-Qaeda, are now even more powerful, since Taliban\Pakistan emerged.
The latter, are even more vicious in their perception of the US presence
in the region.
Additionally, Obama's verdict that,
Taliban and Al-Qaeda still pose a threat to Europe and to the US , is a
bit of a stretch.. Taliban has not invaded the US or Europe . They resist
the US-Led-NATO who invaded their land. Hence, who poses a threat to the
other? Is it Taliban or else, the US-Led-NATO?
people, in the Arab and Muslim Worlds and others, believe that, not
Taliban but, the US-led-NATO\Israel, are the most dangerous in the World.
The signs of the US-Led-NATO\Israel' danger, are there in the killing of
innocent civilians in Palestine: Gaza, West Bank, in Iraq , in Afghanistan
and in Pakistan . Almost, the same drones, the same F16, the same bombs
that thrown on Gaza, thrown on Iraq, Afghanistan and these days,
systematically, thrown on innocent people in North-Western Pakistan, by
the Afghan borders.
The hope is in the US taxpayers. It's the role of US taxpayers to stop
this continuous madness of the US-Led-NATO\Israel in Afghanistan , in
Pakistan , in Iraq , and in Palestine . The US taxpayers already, have a
lot on their plate, as a result of the credit crunch, and the recurrent,
and rising financial crises. Raising awareness amongst US taxpayers, has
become a 'must', as most US taxpayers don't seem to be quite conscious of
where their monies go.
Professor, Dr. Ali Al-Hail, Professor of
Mass Communication, Twice Fulbright
Award Winner, Fulbright
Visiting Scholar, Vice-President Of Qatar Fulbright Group, CSR Award Judge
and Board Member of AUSACE, ASC, IABD, NEBAA, BEA, IMDA and EAJMC American
Can be contacted via: