Mission & Name
US Foreign Policy (Dr. El-Najjar's Articles)
War, Negation and Muslim Identity Revisited
By Ramzy Baroud
ccun.org, October 22, 2009
A Muslim writer begins an article with, 'who says the campaign
for animal rights was started in the West ..' She goes on to argue that
Islam provided the original treatise on the humane treatment of animals. Her
case was poorly constructed, inadequately executed, although the essence of
her idea was to a degree, accurate. Islamic tradition has indeed laid a
foundation, with clear boundaries regarding the humane treatment of animals.
But why did the author, like so many others, choose to turn what
should have been a constructive argument, into a diatribe? Was it necessary
to charge Western discourses, resorting to the ever predictable
classification of “us and them”, instead of trying to find a common cause?
The same point can be made regarding other discussions, whether
pertaining to human rights (women’s rights in particular), the environment,
labor rights, and many others.
In her defense, Amirah Sulaiman was
simply following an existing pattern, commonly used to delineate one’s
cultural or religious progression, at the expense of another.
it’s more than that, it’s also a defense mechanism, a haunting reminder that
the alleged civilizational clash, although more imagined and politicized,
than real, pervades many aspects of our perception of ourselves and of
Among Muslim intellectuals, as in societies, this paradigm
Cultural animosity, collective defensiveness,
racism (and Orientalism), among other overriding cultural trends existed
long before distained US foreign policy in the Middle East became the
defining norm, before the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 and the
wars against Iraq and Afghanistan. But these events emboldened existing
arguments on both sides, with Muslims solidifying as a collective victim,
and the US, from a Muslim point of view, seen as a vulgar, but true
representation of the West.
Of course, Muslims and Islam had their
own ominous representations in the US, thus ‘Western’ media, culture and
psyche – the dagger wielding bearded man, who abuses women, whenever he
takes time away from blowing up infidels. As comical as I intended this to
sound, as disturbingly true such a depiction is in the minds of many.
It would be utterly unfair and largely inaccurate to equate the ‘Western’
misrepresentation of Islam and Muslims, with the latter’s misrepresentation
of the West. The former approaches its caricatured depiction from a chest
thumping, Fox News mentality of militarily powerful and economically stable
countries. Its view of the other is largely hegemonic and its standard
solution to bringing wars to an end is with military surges and the
increasing of military assistance (with Iraq, Afghanistan, and Pakistan
being the current cases in point.)
Collective Muslim identity
however is largely fragmented, between governments that only represent
themselves, and peoples facing many forms of oppression: political tyranny
at home, external repression (war, foreign interventions, etc), economic
uncertainty (fuelled by inequality and compounded by unfiltered
globalization), and extremism.
The so-called war on terror, for
obvious reasons, cemented that fragmentation. On one hand, it reinforced
many Muslims’ growing sense of victimization; a notion that itself resulted
in both submissiveness and extremism. On the other it inspired a re-think,
positive at times, self-negating at others: it kindled a affirmative sense
of identity and pride among a generation desperate to identify itself
according to its own priorities and on its own turf, while, on the other
hand, it led to a (minor) movement of intellectual migration, which sought
in the ‘West’ an escape from the oppressive reality, of which, of course the
‘West’ is equally responsible.
But it was not war alone (and in
itself) that shaped Muslim perceptions of the ‘West’; it was rather the US’
and (to lesser extent Britain’s) insistence that their war championed an
essentially Western discourse on democracy and human rights. Such arguments
took place in an already hostile atmosphere: incessant media and academic
mutterings about Islam’s shortcomings, and a growing right wing, racist
tendencies in various Western countries targeting immigrants and minorities,
many of whom are Muslims.
When such political, military and
intellectual encroachment is backed by such statements as that made by US
Deputy Undersecretary of Defense for Intelligence, Lieutenant General
William G. Boykin (now retired), then the plot thickens, and the collective
polarization of both societies grows. Boykin, author of “Never Surrender: A
Soldier's Journey to the Crossroads of Faith and Freedom,” became famous for
his infamous quote, several years ago, in reference to a Muslim militant in
Mogadishu: “I knew that my God was bigger than his. I knew that my God was a
real God and his was an idol.”
This was a lone quotation, of course,
in a sea of bigoted references that defined many officials and media pundits
during the Bush Administration. Such voices are now, somewhat mute,
although, its hard to believe that the advent of President Barack Obama has
altered a culture in its entirety.
It takes generations for genuine
trust to take hold, and the countdown cannot possibly start as long as one
US solider is stationed in a Muslim country for the purpose of conducting
war and occupation.
Yet again, there is more to all of this.
Reversing intellectual dogmas and collective realizations is too convoluted
a process; it requires time, action and good will.
In the meantime,
Muslims, who insist on living in the shadow of the ‘West’ as unreserved
aficionados or obsessed detractors must redefine their own discourses. As
for the latter, they must not allow war alone, MTV consumer media culture,
hegemonic globalization and racist remarks by a politician or a born again
evangelical to taint their entire view of what are essentially unique,
diverse and in many ways impressive civilizations that have done much good.
Indeed, there is the like of Boykin, but there are millions of others who
are peace-loving, ordinary people, some of whom are ardent advocates of
human rights, anti-war campaigners, including the thousands who have
repeatedly broken the siege on Gaza, and previous to that Iraq. Muslims too
must quit caricaturing them, reducing them to enemies, juxtaposing Muslims’
essential righteousness with ‘Western’ essential depravity. Not only are
such reductions inaccurate and self-defeating, they also break down possible
alliances between the forces of good in this world, in a time when they are
- Ramzy Baroud (www.ramzybaroud.net)
is an author and editor of PalestineChronicle.com. His work has been
published in many newspapers, journals and anthologies around the world. His
latest book is, "The Second Palestinian Intifada: A Chronicle of a People's
Struggle" (Pluto Press, London), and his forthcoming book is, “My Father Was
a Freedom Fighter: Gaza’s Untold Story” (Pluto Press, London), now available
for pre-orders on Amazon.com.