| 
 Al-Jazeerah History
 
 Archives
 
 Mission & Name
 
 Conflict Terminology
 
 Editorials
 
 Gaza Holocaust
 
 Gulf War
 
 Isdood
 
 Islam
 
 News
 
 News Photos
 
 Opinion  
	
	
	Editorials
 
 US Foreign Policy (Dr. El-Najjar's Articles)
 
 www.aljazeerah.info
 
	  
           |  | 
 The US Geostrategic Objectives Behind the War in 
	Yemen
 
 By Abdus Sattar Ghazali
 
 Al-Jazeerah, CCUN, April 13, 2015
 
 
 The United States is supplying intelligence to the Saudi-led 
	  coalition bombing rebel positions in Yemen and will expedite arms supplies 
	  to the alliance, Deputy Secretary of State Tony Blinken said in the Saudi 
	  capital Riyadh on Tuesday. After talks with the Saudi officials, Blinken 
	  told reporters that Saudi Arabia was sending a "strong message to the 
	  Houthis and their allies that they cannot overrun Yemen by force".
 "As part of that effort, we have expedited weapons deliveries, we have 
	increased our intelligence sharing, and we have established a joint 
	coordination planning cell in the Saudi operation centre." The US Deputy Secretary of State's comments came hours after the 
	International Committee of the Red Cross flew medical personnel for the 
	first time into Yemen amid delays that have worsened the humanitarian 
	situation in Aden. Fierce fighting between militias loyal to Hadi and and 
	the Houthis has been raging in the port city for days, according to Al 
	Jazeera.  Human catastrophe
 More than a 100,000 people 
	have fled their homes after the Saudi-led coalition launched air strikes in 
	Yemen, according to UNICEF, the UN agency responsible for children 
	welfare. A spokesman from the agency, Rajat Madhok, told Al Jazeera that 
	most of those who have been displaced are women and children.  "Most 
	displacements have taken place from and within al-Dhale, Abyan, Amran, 
	Saada, Hajja. The displaced persons are mostly being hosted with relatives," 
	Madhok said.
 
 In a statement published on Tuesday, UNICEF said 74 
	children caught up in fighting had been killed and another 44 maimed since 
	March 26.  "These are conservative figures and UNICEF believes that the 
	total number of children killed is much higher," the statement read.
 
 On April 2, Under-Secretary-General for Humanitarian Affairs and Emergency 
	Relief Coordinator Valerie Amos issued a statement saying:  “Reports from 
	humanitarian partners in different parts of the country indicate that some 
	519 people have been killed and nearly 1,700 injured in the past two weeks – 
	over 90 of them children.Tens of thousands of people have fled their homes, 
	some by crossing the sea to Djibouti and Somalia. .Electricity, water and 
	essential medicines are in short supply.”
 
 Yemen already is the 
	region’s poorest country with around 26 million population. War exacerbated 
	things greatly. The World Food Program says about 13 million Yemenis have 
	only polluted water for drinking and other uses. Around a million aged-five 
	or under Yemeni children are malnourished. Expect the number to grow 
	exponentially in coming weeks and months.
 
 This is not a 
	Shia-Sunni conflict
 As usual, western media is misinforming about the latest conflict in the 
	Middle East. It is projecting the Yemen conflict as Shia-Sunni strife  since 
	the Houthis forced President Abd Rabbuh Mansur Hadi to flee to Saudi Arabia. 
	Itt is also reported as Saudi bid to curtail or counter the Iranian 
	influence which has reportedly supported the Houthis. This may be true to 
	some extent but the real agenda behind the US-backed Saudi effort to 
	reinstall the ousted President Hadi.Interestingly, the US has always 
	double standard when it comes to supporting the so-called democracy around 
	the world. In Yemen it is supporting restoring its client government of 
	President Hadi who was “elected” after overthrowing his predecessor 
	President Ali Abdullah Saleh in a coup. He was the only candidate for the 
	office on the ballot. Not surprisingly in the circumstance, he “won” more 
	than 99 percent of the vote.
 
 However, in Ukraine, a democratically 
	elected President (Yanukovych) was chased by a mob from his office and a 
	client fascist government was installed. Yanukovych was elected in a 
	contested election judged to be “free and fair” by international monitoring 
	bodies. Now the US says that by leaving the country Yanukovych lost 
	legitimacy. While a fleeing Yemeni president has not lost legitimacy and the 
	US is backing Saudi attacks on Yemen in the name of democracy.
 
 Now 
	let us see who are the Houthis, a Zaydi sect of Shia Muslims and how the 
	current crisis developed. The current strife led by the Houthis was in the 
	making for at least a decade. The Houthis and their allies represent a 
	diverse cross-section of Yemeni society and the majority of Yemenites. At 
	present the domestic alliance against Al-Hadi includes Shia Muslims and 
	Sunni Muslims alike.
 
 The Houthis organized themselves in the early 
	1990s as a secular progressive group of “Young Believers”. Like Hezbollah of 
	Lebanon, they helped poor communities and organized youth camps in the 
	northern Saada province. With President Ali Abdullah Saleh’s pro-US 
	government becoming increasingly repressive against any popular reform 
	movement, the Houtis grew rapidly into an army of young men, soon becoming a 
	dominating force in the North. They were seeking democracy, openly opposing 
	the US-Saudi supported dictator, who was kept in power by Washington since 
	1978. The Houthis organized a first uprising against the Saleh Government in 
	2004, but were defeated by Saleh’s brutal army with heavy backing by the 
	Saudi tyrants.
 
 The Houthis emerged as a mass movement against 
	President Saleh in 2011. Under continuous popular and Houthi pressure and 
	with Washington’s nod, President Saleh finally stepped down in February 
	2012, ceding power to his Vice President Abd Rabbuh Mansur 
	Hadi. President Ali Abdullah Saleh was in power since 1978. He amassed $60 
	billion during his long corrupt rule, according to a UN report released in 
	February 2015.
 
 When Hadi became Yemeni president he dragged his feet 
	and was working against the implementation of the arrangements that had been 
	arranged through consensus and negotiations in Yemen’s National Dialogue, 
	which convened after Ali Abdullah Saleh was forced to hand over his power. 
	The Houthis pressed for a more egalitarian representation in parliament. 
	They attracted small parties and like-minded splinter groups to form a 
	coalition and eventually succeeded in taking control by storming government 
	buildings and Parliament in January 2015. Hadi resigned, fled to his native 
	Aden and eventually received safe haven in Saudi Arabia. The Houtis hastily 
	formed a five-member transition government and intended to write a new 
	Constitution with democratic principles. However, Washington would not 
	tolerate a non-client government in the strategic southern tip of the Arab 
	Peninsula.
 
 On March 25, Saudis, with the blessings of Washington, 
	launched airstrikes in Yemen with the professed objective of restoring the 
	ousted President Hadi who had resigned when the Houthis seized the 
	Presidential palace in January 2015. Saudi Arabia has formed a coalition of 
	more than 10 countries try to restore President Hadi's government. The 
	coalition includes Bahrain, Kuwait, Qatar, the United Arab Emirates (UAE), 
	Egypt, Jordan, Morocco and Sudan.
 
 Yemen is a growing reminder of 
	just how important the strategic U.S. partnership with Saudi Arabia really 
	is, says Anthony Cordesmanof the Center for Strategic and International 
	Studies (CSIS) in Washington. It is one thing to talk about the war against 
	ISIS, and quite another to realize that U.S. strategic interests require a 
	broad level of stability in the Gulf and Arabian Peninsula and one that is 
	dependent on Saudi Arabia as a key strategic partner.
 
 The 
	US, Saudi geo-political interests in Yemen
 While the House of Saudi has long considered Yemen a subordinate province 
	of some sorts and as a part of Riyadh’s sphere of influence, the US wants to 
	make sure that it could control the Bab Al-Mandeb, the Gulf of Aden, and the 
	Socotra Islands, argues Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya. The Bab Al-Mandeb is an 
	important strategic chokepoint for international maritime trade and energy 
	shipments that connects the Persian Gulf via the Indian Ocean with the 
	Mediterranean Sea via the Red Sea. It is just as important as the Suez Canal 
	for the maritime shipping lanes and trade between Africa, Asia, and Europe. 
 Added to the geopolitical importance of Yemen in overseeing strategic 
	maritime corridors is its military’s missile arsenal. Yemen’s missiles could 
	hit any ships in the Gulf of Aden or Bab Al-Mandeb. In this regard, the 
	Saudi attack on Yemen’s strategic missile depots serves both US and Israeli 
	interests. The aim is not only to prevent them from being used to retaliate 
	against exertions of Saudi military force, but to also prevent them from 
	being available to a Yemeni government aligned to either Iran, Russia, or 
	China.
 
 For Anthony 
	Cordesman, Yemen does not match the strategic importance of the Gulf, 
	but it is still of great strategic importance to the stability of Saudi 
	Arabia and the Arabian Peninsula.  It is critical to note that far more is 
	involved than energy: the cost and security of every cargo that goes through 
	the Suez canal, the security of U.S. and other allied combat ships moving 
	through the canal, the economic stability of Egypt, and the security of 
	Saudi Arabia's key port at Jeddah and major petroleum export facility 
	outside the Gulf. The Energy Information Administration describes the energy 
	impact of importance of this chokepoint as follows:
 
 -The Bab 
	el-Mandeb Strait is a chokepoint between the Horn of Africa and the Middle 
	East, and it is a strategic link between the Mediterranean Sea and the 
	Indian Ocean. The strait is located between Yemen, Djibouti, and Eritrea, 
	and connects the Red Sea with the Gulf of Aden and the Arabian Sea. Most 
	exports from the Persian Gulf that transit the Suez Canal and SUMED Pipeline 
	also pass through Bab el-Mandeb.
 -An estimated 3.8 million bbl/d of crude oil and refined petroleum 
	products flowed through this waterway in 2013 toward Europe, the United 
	States, and Asia, an increase from 2.9 million bbl/d in 2009. Oil shipped 
	through the strait decreased by almost one-third in 2009 because of the 
	global economic downturn and the decline in northbound oil shipments to 
	Europe. Northbound oil shipments increased through Bab el-Mandeb Strait in 
	2013, and more than half of the traffic, about 2.1 million bbl/d, moved 
	northbound to the Suez Canal and SUMED Pipeline. -The Bab el-Mandeb Strait is 18 miles wide at its narrowest point, 
	limiting tanker traffic to two 2-mile-wide channels for inbound and outbound 
	shipments. Closure of the Bab el-Mandeb could keep tankers from the Persian 
	Gulf from reaching the Suez Canal or SUMED Pipeline, diverting them around 
	the southern tip of Africa, adding to transit time and cost. In addition, 
	European and North African southbound oil flows could no longer take the 
	most direct route to Asian markets via the Suez Canal and Bab el-Mandeb. Any hostile air or sea presence in Yemen could threaten the entire 
	traffic through the Suez Canal, as well as a daily flow of oil and petroleum 
	products that the EIA estimates increased from 2.9 mmb/d in 2009 to 3.8 
	mmb/d in 2013. Such a threat also can be largely covert or indirect. Libya 
	demonstrated this under Qaddafi when he had a cargo ship drop mines in the 
	Red Sea.
 The archipelago of Socotra
 Maritime trade from East and Southern Africa to Western Europe also 
	transits within proximity of the Yemeni archipelago of Socotra (Suqutra), 
	through the Gulf of Aden and the Red Sea. Socotra in the Indian Ocean is 
	located some 80 kilometres off the Horn of Africa and 380 kilometres South 
	of the Yemeni coastline. A military base in Socotra could be used to oversee 
	the movement of vessels including war ships in an out of the Gulf of Aden.
 The Socotra archipelago is part of the Great Game opposing Russia and 
	America. During the Cold War, the Soviet Union had a military presence in 
	Socotra, which at the time was part of South Yemen, says Prof Michel 
	Chossudovsky of the Global Research. In 2009, the Russians entered into 
	renewed discussions with the Yemeni government regarding the establishment 
	of a Naval base on Socotra island.
 
 In January, 2010, the 
	then-President Ali Abdullah Saleh and General David Petraeus, Commander of 
	the US Central Command met for high level discussions behind closed doors. 
	Several reports confirmed that the Saleh-Petraeus meetings were intent upon 
	redefining US military involvement in Yemen including the establishment of a 
	full-fledged military base on the island of Socotra. The Iranian news agency 
	Fars reported that  president Ali Abdullah Saleh had “surrendered Socotra 
	for Americans who would set up a military base.” Following the 
	Petraeus-Saleh meeting, a Russian Navy communiqué “confirmed that Russia did 
	not give up its plans to have bases for its ships on Socotra island.
 
 In short, to borrow former World Bank official Peter Koenig, "domination of 
	Yemen is an important step on the Zionist-Anglo-Saxon Empire’s path towards 
	world hegemony. Like Ukraine, Yemen is just another square on the 
	geopolitical chess board which the exceptional nation aims to dominate.
 
 Abdus Sattar Ghazali is the Chief Editor of the Journal of America (www.journalofamerica.net)
 Email: asghazali2011 (@) gmail.com
 ***
 
 Share this article with your facebook friends
 |  |  |