No Other Country Threatens the World Like Zionist
July 7, 2019
The hidden role of Zionism in your (s)elected government
There are regimes as cruel as
Israel’s. But our governments do not support them to the
detriment of our own nations. We are not punished for refusing
to serve those regimes or commit treason against our own
countries in their favour. Only Israel occupies our governments
that way. And our minds.
Meticulously planned control of public officials, vetted and
monitored behind the scenes, ensures that democracy does not
occur in the West. In an article on Redress
Information & Analysis, Eve Mykytyn made the point very
well in the title of her article, “Americans
can criticise America. But not Israel“.
Similarly, Britons can criticise Britain, but not Israel.
Germans can criticise Germany… and so on.
What does this tell us? It tells us that, in spite of how
Britons, Americans or Germans vote, they are not free to form
their own governments. There is a non-elected government that
controls the UK Parliament, the US Congress, the German
Bundestag, and many other legislatures. It is a foreign reign of
terror run by Israel and its Zionist networks. Have you wondered
why so many members of the US Congress have Israeli citizenship?
Or why a US citizen in Texas has to pledge allegiance to Israel
(promise to refrain from participating in the boycott of Israel)
in order to keep her job in Texas? Over 50 per cent of US
states, including Texas, has anti-BDS legislation.1
The laws vary from state to state,
but anti-BDS legislation has been widely challenged on legal
grounds, and with good reason. Without going into the specifics
of the various anti-BDS laws, it would suffice it to say that
unless Israel is officially a part of the US (or vice
versa), state enacted anti-BDS laws violate the US
Constitution by engaging in foreign relations (granting
political privileges to Israel) – a right reserved for the
federal government. Moreover, whether state or federal law,
prohibiting boycotts is a violation of the US Constitution’s
First Amendment – the right to free speech and the right to
In the US, as in all Western nations, “elections” and
governments have become institutions of Zionist vetted and
Yet, we falsely believe thatweexercised
choices; that there werechoices
to exercise. If you live in a “Western democracy”, your
government supports Zionism, at least in the sense that it has
buckled under to it. Look at what happens to rare conscientious
objectors, like Jeremy Corbyn in the UK and Represnetative Ilhan
Omar in the US. My hat goes off to those honourable human beings
for what they have endured in their attempts to pursue justice.
We might not all have the intellectual or emotional capacity of
Corbyn and Omar, but we can surely all pull our weight. We
mustn’t get intellectually lazy.
When a country acts against its own interests in favour of
Israel, what does that mean? Does it mean that Glasgow,
Vancouver, Milwaukee and Bonn are Israeli territory? Your guess
is as good as mine. One of the five criteria for being a country
is having borders. To the best of my understanding, Israel has
never established borders. Therefore, we don’t exactly know
where it is. The USA has military bases in over 130 countries –
some sources say over 170 countries. But since Israel controls
the US to the extent it does, the US is not a sovereign nation.
It would be more accurate to call it the USI. No – Israel is not
a country like any other, it is the world’s largest and oldest
terror network, and it has achieved territory, noy borders. We
can call it Terror Without Borders.
In the run up to the recent Israeli elections, we saw Binyamin
Netanyahu forming a partnership with Otzma
Yehudit, or Jewish Power, a group that openly advocates the
ethnic cleansing of Palestinians.
Jewish Power, whose leaders have a
long history of expressing support for the persecution of the
Palestinians, the expulsion of Arabs from Palestine, the banning
of intermarriage and sexual relations between Jews and Arabs,
proudly call themselves disciples of Meir Kahane. Similarly,
Netanyahu’s primary challenger, former Israeli army chief Benny
Gantz, broadcast a promo bragging
about how much killing and destruction he committed in Gaza in
2014, in a series of campaign videos for his political party,
posted on YouTube and social media prior to the elections.3
The Israeli New Right’s co-leader,
Ayelet Shaked, performed
in an advertisement where
she sprayed on perfume from a bottle labelled “Fascism”,
proclaiming that it “smells like democracy to me”. That sort of
thing works in Israel – a country where well over 90 per cent of
the voting population have chosen to support ethnic cleansing.
For over 70 years!
You can’t say that about the population of Saudi Arabia or any
autocratic country. You can’t even say it about the 12-year
autocratic rule in Hitler’s Germany. Hitler was a crazy despot
who, somewhat democratically elected, became a genocidal
In Nazi Germany, you could be killed for being Jewish. Or Roma.
Or homosexual, etc.
In Israel, you can be killed for not being Jewish.
Zionism’s claimed raison
d’être is that Jews from anywhere have a right to “return”
to Palestine/Israel after thousands of years.
The logic changes in mid-sentence: Palestinians – although their
right to return to identifiable properties can be verified (many
families even retain keys to homes they were expelled from) –
must accept “the realities on the ground”, after 70 years.
We are all Palestinians. The statement is not to be construed as
cheapening the suffering of the Palestinians. It is said to
indicate that we all run the risk of the destiny that is theirs,
if we don’t start resisting, like they have for over 70 years.
“We are all Palestinians” is also not to be construed as
indicating that Rwandans, Sudanese, Congolese, the people of
Yemen or any other people are not equally deserving of
protection. “We are all Palestinians” simply signifies that we
are subject to the exact same dynamics of Zionist pursuit as the
ethnically diminished Palestinians. Just at an earlier stage.
Zionist greed isn’t a legitimate cause, nor is the freedom to
perpetuate it at everyone else’s expense. Yet, the infliction of
intellectual anaesthesia, alternated with threats, that we
endure to prevent us from realising this, and from rising up
against the obliteration of democracy is forceful, repeated, and
often accompanied by popular symbols of freedom. Anything to
create a total chaos in the mind. Chaos and fear. Or simply
exhaustion. What levels of brainwash will we accept before
taking back reason and humanity? How much corruption of the
minds of our children and ourselves are we willing to accept
from institutions of learning or from “news” outlets?
This article addresses some of the reasons that our overriding
pursuit of democracy needs to be concerned with, first and
foremost, throwing off the multi-level terror of Israel. The
issues of this article will be roughly divided into the
following four subsections (although they overlap to a large
Democracy presupposes informed consent of the people to be
How and why are people “educated”?
Is it a matter of opinion or fact whether the World Trade
Centre exploded or imploded?
Punished for noticing the largest scale holocaust in known
Democracy (people power) is a term
derived from the Greek demos(people)
Democracy can exist only with the informed consent of the
people, the governed. Consent is meaningless unless it rests on
relevant information. Democracy does not exist where votes are
either obtained by fraud or embezzled after the ballots are
counted. Democracy dies where information
What happens to your vote after the poll count? Does it die
behind closed doors? If the decisions that impact the
“represented” are made behind closed doors, as a result of
that is inserted between the voter and the decision-maker,
the vote is effectively cancelled.4
Israel sports an unbroken legacy of
generation after generation of democratically elected genocide.
To achieve the Israeli brand of democracy, however, the
population – the demos — had to be replaced, with Zionists. The
result is an ethnically cleansed democracy – voilá! That is
Israel, or occupied Palestine or whatever you choose to call
As Israel has no borders, its brand of “democracy” affects a few
other countries as well. How do other Zionist-ruled countries
replace the demos and its natural choices with Zionists, ruling
in ways that go against the interests of the majority of people?
It is not necessary to replace every non-Zionist by eliminating
them physically in all countries. It often suffices to eliminate
their ability, or their courage, or just their energy to think.
Was it Steve Biko who said that the
most powerful weapon in the hands of an oppressor is the mind of
the oppressed?That is pretty incisive and succinct.
To confuse us from seeing clearly, Hitler ramrodded down your
throats throughout our educational captivity. We are simply not
told that Zionism is older and more organised than Nazism. That
that’s how it has had the time to achieve such depth and
magnitude, to become even more deadly, more culture-suffocating.
In order to prevent us from noticing a holocaust even huger than
Hitler’s mind-boggling genocide of Jews and Roma and many
others, almost everything we have heard about Israel in school
consists of outright fabrications. I’m not just talking about
how we were deceived about Israel’s “inception” or the 1967
war. I’m talking about
almost everything we are told about Israel in school. Or did
your teachers tell you that the plans to ethnically cleanse
Palestine and replace the population with immigrants started in
Yet, we are compelled, by subtle and not so subtle terror
permeating all areas of life, to reason and act against our
better judgement. The terror is executed, for instance, by
attacking access to facts; instilling fear of retribution for
asking questions or analysing; creating emotional exhaustion by
ignoring obvious truths, making people prove self-evident
nauseum. Let’s have a look at how we are “educated”.
2. How and why are people “educated”?
Let’s start with the question of why anyone who has the power to
influence education would want to educate people about anything.
The reason is likely to compel them to act in a certain way.
It has been explicitly stated in various terms that perception
management and, where that doesn’t work, action management is at
the core of Zionist goals. The Oded Yinon Plan and the Project
for the New American Century are but two chilling examples. How
are such plans implemented in daily life? How can the mind and
its perceptions be controlled? One has to rinse the brain of
competing impulses, including the impulse to question.
Hijacking and loading the languageis a favourite means
of controlling people’s thoughts and actions. Ponder the term “holocaust
denial” its expanding definitions, its application and
who is excused from its reach. Another perfect example of this
type of brainwash is the term “diaspora”.
It implies a right to “return” to a place, i.e. it presupposes
dispersement from a common geographical origin. How about the
I’m particularly impressed with that deflection. How about “conspiracy
theorist”? Am I a conspiracy theorist? I understand the
term “conspiracy” to refer to the planning of a crime by more
than one person. Do I believe that more than one person is
involved in the biggest heist since white supremacy – Zionism –
which is expanding to new depth and magnitude as we speak? Yes.
I will explore the term anti-Semitismin
a separate article. For the time being, I will work with the
following definition: I understand the term “anti-Semitism” to
be limited to include any person or notion that does not support
Jewish supremacy, as naturally manifested by the right of
Zionist Israel to create a Jewish
democracy that has a right to defend itself against
discomfort in any form by eliminating the suggestion of any
threat to its way of life, by any means necessary, limited to
the territory of Israel Without Borders.
While blackmail, extortion, racketeering, bribery, murder, money
laundering, embezzlement, arson, robbery, dealing in obscene
matter, etc. constitute prohibited acts in most or all legal
systems, Zionist terror networks need not fear the application
of these prohibitions to them, anywhere in the West. In the US,
Influenced and Corrupt Organisations Act (RICO) is a
federal law that provides for severe criminal penalties and
civil causes of action for mafia-like tactics and organised
crime which affects interstate or foreign commerce. RICO covers
the aforementioned crimes and others, when performed as part of
an ongoing criminal organisation, and provides that leaders of a
syndicate can be tried for crimes they have ordered. We know
that RICO is not enforced against the American Israel Public
Affairs Committee (AIPAC), the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) or
similar networks. Instead, these entities’may, and do, offer
all-expenses-paid trips to Israel to each member of the US
Congress, while enjoying the privilege of “legal” backing by a
system that has “found” these trips to be educational.
This is a result of brainwash, as well as of subtle and not so
subtle coercion of law-enforcement agents, including judges.
Law-enforcement agents have been carefully educated in what they
can and can’t “find”.
Similarly, acts of extortion, harassment, slander, libel,
sabotage, persecution, including threats to life and livelihood,
are determined to be “lobbying” if done by a Zionist. Let’s
compare the benign term lobbyingto
the knee-jerk term terrorism.
Obviously, if a Muslim engages in these practices, they are to
be labelled “terrorism”. Stated differently, the terms
“lobbyism” and “terrorism” are interchangeable to a large
only by the identity of the actor, not by any element of
Please folks, please,
stop calling these acts “lobbying” – reinforcing the smoke
screen plays right into the hands of the vilest terrorists on
Let’s consult the experts on how education works practically on
an ongoing basis. How do you go about information-suffocation,
including culture-suffocation, with the aim of achieving reality
replacement and maintaining self-censorship among the masses?
Following is a selection of means for Isra-Zio occupation of
a. Israel’s internet-Invasion – Google, Wikipedia, the
“Anti”-Defamation League, etc.
It is increasingly difficult to find certain relevant
information on the web, even when you know it is there,
including things you have viewed before, or even published
yourself. It is obvious that algorithms are re-set to catch what
suits Google, the ADL, AIPAC and their ilk, while they simply
remove a lot that threatens to shed light on Zionist terror.
See, for instance, the video “Keeping
Wikipedia and the internet more “Zionist and balanced in nature”.Naftali
Bennet, on ArutzSheva TV, IsraelNationalNews.com, said:
[inaudible], in conjunction with My Israel, has arranged
Instruction day for Wiki editors. The goal of the day is to
teach people to edit in Wikipedia, which is the number one
source of information today in the world… We wanna be there.
We wanna be the guys who influence what is written there,
how it’s written, and to ensure
that it’sbalanced and Zionist in nature (emphasis
b. AIPAC and campus control
One avenue of culture
strangulation / enforced
cultureis the concerted threat-mechanism that has been
part and parcel of Western campuses for a very long time. One
example is the onslaught on University of California at Los
Angeles (UCLA) students who voted in favour of the boycott
Israeli products campaign, BDS. UCLA students have told me that
one student received a phone call in which he was informed that
if he voted for BDS, he “will never go to med[ical] school,
you’ll see”. Another student received a death threat around the
time of the vote, but was not able to determine where the threat
came from. In the following clip from an AIPAC conference, AIPAC
tells you in its own words how it replaces people who
don’t agree with Israel (in the United States government and on
AIPAC student outreach:
A short version of AIPAC’s announcement of how it will take over
student governments can be seen here:
c. Presstitution and the role of mainstream media
The above explains how the same blatant fabrications can come at
us from hundreds of media outlets simultaneously, giving the
illusion that so many reports must be based on actual facts or
events. When “investigative” journalists of almost all media
outlets collectively lose the drive or the courage to
investigate, they fall in line with official narratives that
couldn’t be true by the laws of physics. How many suspect that
something is wrong with, say, the official 9/11-narrative? Why
do they choose to remain silent if they do suspect? Could it be
overwhelming majority of journalists accept, or even agree, that
it is necessary to keep the essential truths from the readers,to
keep them voting for forces that bring about their destruction?
Is the press one of these forces? Does the press aim at
subjugating us into thinking the government’s thoughts for it?
Is the Press, like the legislature, the judiciary and the
executive, and arm of the government in Western “democracies”?
If almost all “investigative” journalists are entirely without
opinion, or integrity, in relation to the issues they spend
their careers writing about, why do we keep calling them
journalists? Shouldn’t they be referred to as presstitutes?
It would be less confusing. The
alternative would be to declare almost every journalist of a
mainstream “news” outlet mentally and emotionally unequipped to
understand the results of what they write. That might be
preferable, since it clears them of responsibility for
complicity in war crimes and crimes against humanity, namely,
aiding and abetting the most sinister and well planned world war
in our documented history. There are a precious few
conscientious objectors among mainstream journalists. For
example, Marc Lamont Hill. Look what happened to him.
3. Is it a matter of opinion or of fact whether the World Trade
Centre exploded or imploded?
The reason I address this issue here is that the official 9/11
story has become one of the most devastating devices of
deception that Zionism uses to gear the masses towards accepting
endless war. It is deception management at its finest.
The Official 9/11 narrative is one of those issues (mentioned
below) that come to us in sealed envelopes, permitted
conclusions provided within. Questioning any part of it invokes
reprisals; suggesting it was an inside job is taboo.
I have been called a “conspiracy theorist” for disbelieving the
official narrative of how the 9/11 bombings against some of the
most surveilled places in the world were planned and carried out
by a man operating from a cave in Afghanistan, probably while on
dialysis. (What do you call someone who believes it?) I have
been met with angry responses like “Are you a holocaust denier
as well?” “Are you anti-Semitic?” My initial reaction to these
responses was to wonder what kind of somnolent mind would jump
to that impression from what I said. However, I had to reflect
anew when a very intelligent, honest, and well-educated friend
recently stated that her main reason for believing the official
story of 9/11 was that she couldn’t believe that so many people
would be able to remain silent about what had actually happened.
She said that people in the know would not be able to keep quiet
about it; that if there were people other than Muslim terrorists
behind the bombings, they would start talking about it. They do
talk about it! But she is justified in not knowing that people
go to great lengths, confer and compare notes, to pursue
fact-finding on 9/11. Most media outlets never touch the matter.
Even more interesting, in a sense, is that most media didn’t
question who did it even
in the very beginning. So, they didn’t have any questions
to start with? Now, that chills me.
No, truth isn’toptional.
There is a wide spectrum of room for opinions, but it is not a
matter of opinion whether the World Trade Centre exploded or
imploded. Ask any engineer who hasn’t sold his or her mind. Or
just ask any person who has seen an implosion.
The official explanation we receive for the collapse of the Twin
Towers is that they exploded as
a result ofbeing hit by jets. Yet, this doesn’t explain why
the third tower of the WTC (Building 7) imploded in the same
manner after not
being hit by a jet. Does it?
The 9/11 example highlights the compelling need for history laws
(discussed in the next section) in order to prevent our minds
from wiggling about in the pond of knowledge. Perception
managers will have you believe that it is your extremist
leanings that lead you to doubt the official account.
4. Punished for noticing the largest scale holocaust in known
We are in the midst of the largest scale holocaust in our known
history. Over 40 million Muslims, and counting, have been
ethnically cleansed as a direct and intended result of
meticulously planned Zionist-operated wars.
don’t have a name for this holocaust. It is a matter of no
mention in every major news outlet.All focus must be reserved
for the German holocaust. Let me rephrase that. We must focus on
the part of the German holocaust that targeted the Jews. I just
referred to that holocaust with a lower case “h”. Definitely
anti-Semitic. We have laws against “holocaust-denial”, which
includes asking questions about the German holocaust. What
happened? How many died? You can go to prison for asking
questions like that in Europe, and you are pretty much
guaranteed to lose your job. Not in 1619. In 2019. In other
words, these history laws criminalise research and the
broadcasting of information about the German holocaust. The idea
is that we don’t need to ask questions, because all legitimate
questions have already been asked and answered by the relevant
authorities. The questions have been served
upon us in sealed envelopes, permissible conclusions provided
In a message
on YouTube, Gilad Atzmon argues that history is the attempt to
narrate the past as we move along. Accordingly, he says, history
becomes a meaningful adventure once we revisit and revise the
past. He indicates that when history becomes a sealed,
untouchable, chapter, it is to be equated with a religion and,
when this happens, we have the right to be agnostic. I note with
sadness that not only do we lack the freedoms of information,
thought, speech and press, but also the freedom of religion.
Germany has an anti-Semitism commissioner, and other countries
have similar governmental posts. To protect Semites? Hardly.
Only Jews (I should sayallegedlyto
protect the Jews) – Semites
or not. So, what are these
commissioners expected to monitor, and to prevent or punish?
Xenophobia? Or research and analysis? What I see is that we are
punished in many ways if we notice the unparalleled genocide
unfolding before us. In the Western world we are fond of
boasting that we have democracy. But we persecute those who try
to enjoy it, by attempting to silence them with blackmail,
threats and slander, or other methods that are formally illegal
in every system of nominal democracy.
Danish journalist Poul Osmundsen is a case in point. His
published article, “Asmaas holocaust-porno [on] Facebook“,6
took issue with a photo
gallery that Asmaa
Abdol-Hamid posted on Facebook, which features photographs of
the Nazi and Zio holocausts. The title of the photo gallery
translates as “the holocaust of our time”. Osmundsen dedicated
his entire article to what he called “holocaust porno” and
“anti-Israel death-porno”. He went on and on with variations on
that theme. Untroubled by facts, Osmundsen was unmoved by what
he saw in the photos. That shocks me. I was very disturbed
indeed by what I saw. But Osmundsen was outraged that
Abdol-Hamid dares to equate the Nazi holocaust with the Israeli
holocaust. I use the present tense about the gallery, because it
is still available to view. Osmundsen complained about the
site’s 5,000 followers. At the time of writing it had 10,845.
His main complaint concerned the fact that pictures from the
Nazi extermination of Jews were coupled with corresponding
pictures from the Israeli-Palestinian “conflict” (sic).
He ranted about the distasteful anti-Israeli propaganda of
equating Israel’s “policy” (sic)
towards the Palestinians with the Nazi extermination of Jews;
was outraged by the temerity of likening Palestinian deaths to
Jewish deaths, of calling the Zionist holocaust planned. He
considered the photo of a dead Jew to depict the holocaust. A
similar photo of a dead Palestinian to depict “Palestinian
death-porno”. The mendacity of his article was outshone only by
the intensity of his hatred, possibly paralleled by a perplexing
stupidity. His revelling in terms like “porno” (the article was
replete with sexual innuendo) is interesting. When I read his
rantings and ravings, I felt a sense of embarrassment for
witnessing what was nothing short of an onanistic frenzy of
narcissism. One does wish that people would do these things in
Osmundsen asserted that Israel practices self-criticism, that it
punishes those who persecute Palestinians, but that the media
fail to report this. Osmundsen explained that, “in Arab
culture”, no distinction is made between Israeli and Jew – they
are all guilty. In “Arab culture”, theyfail
to distinguish the guilty from the non-guilty. The article was
supplemented by shocking outpourings of raw hatred, in the
comments section. Shocking outpourings.
And Zionism is to be treated as a political ideology? Not by
manifestation of mental illness?
Only in Israel. Osmundsen refers to Israel as “the only
democratic legal system in the Middle East”. He gripes about
reprisals against those who mention the elephant in the room,
where Muslims are concerned. He complains about hate speech.
Yet, we must give credit where credit is due. Osmundsen was
correct about one thing: equating the Nazi with the Zio
It can’t be right to compare a 12-year rule by a crazy despot to
a country where the majority chooses ethnic cleansing for seven
decades. And claims that 70 years of genocide is legitimate
self-defence. That comparison really is unfair to the German
It is a complete waste of time, of course, to discuss anything
with any avid Zionist, as with anyone else severely afflicted
with narcissism and delusions of grandeur, not to mention
sociopathy. The trouble with Zionism is that these ailments are
prerequisites for becoming a Zionist. All analyses of relevant
matters should therefore be geared to educating sane people
about Zionists. Or those able and willing to be cured, who just
happened to get caught in the crosshairs of hasbara(Israeli
propaganda) and been confused by it.
I hesitate to call the current state of affairs World War III,
because to my way of thinking, World War II didn’t end. There
were regroupings and new methods of pursuing Western supremacy,
now with Zionism leading the charge. But I haven’t seen a
decrease in violence or ethnic cleansing since World War II
supposedly ended. On the contrary.
These are some of the reasons why it is more important to oppose
Zionism and Israel than any other country or entity.
NONE OTHER threatens the world like Zionism and Israel do.