EU Split Over Russia Because of the Mutually Beneficial Relationship
EU split over Russia
Russia Today, September 2, 2008, 22:39
The Foreign Ministry says it regrets the EU’s decision to suspend talks
on a new partnership agreement with Russia. Moscow says the new deal is
just as important to Europe as it is to Russia. The bloc has been split
over its response to the conflict in South Ossetia.
At Monday’s emergency summit in Brussels, EU leaders decided to halt
talks on a new deal with Russia. The move was in response to Moscow’s
role in the conflict between Georgia and South Ossetia. But according to
some members of the European parliament, the summit showed that the
union is anything but united.
Member of the European Parliament, Giulietto Chiesa, said that ‘a
strange situation’ had occurred in the EU:
“The document states Russia made a disproportionate reaction while there
is no mentioning of the attack from the Georgian side, so, we are
talking about ‘disproportionate’ reaction, but against what? That was
not even clear. It is not a good sign because it shows that Europe is
The EU has divided into two groups over the issue. On one side, Western
European states - including France, Italy, Germany and Spain – are
opposed to any harsh steps against Russia.
The French President Nicolas Sarkozy summed up their position:
“We don't want to embark upon a new Cold War where problems in relations
between Russia and Europe can only be settled through military
confrontation. We have to remain calm and cool-headed”.
On the other side, newcomers to the Union – including Poland and the
Baltic countries, backed by Sweden and Great Britain - condemned the
events and insisted that Moscow must be punished for its actions in
John Laughland, an expert from the Institute for Democracy and
Cooperation in Paris, says the EU is hopelessly divided and therefore
“This is an organisation that has been struggling now for nearly ten
years to elaborate a unified foreign policy. It’s precisely because they
cannot agree on anything; they want to try and present a united front to
the world on the situation with Russia, to make an impression that they
are doing something, but in fact the EU is essentially powerless”.
The EU failed to agree on any concrete measures against Moscow. Many
thought sanctions would be imposed, but they weren’t even mentioned.
The only practical outcome of the gathering is that a new partnership
agreement with Europe and Russia to replace the one signed in 1997 has
The Foreign Ministry says it isn’t happy with this, but says Europe
should think about whether this delay is in its interests.
“We do have a lot of issues of mutual concern, and I believe that
without being partners at the negotiating table on these issues we would
not be contributing to the solutions of the problems,” said Andrey
Nesterenko, Foreign Ministry spokesman.
But despite some potentially unpleasant consequences, there is a belief
among Russian politicians that common sense has prevailed.
The Foreign Ministry said that despite the efforts of some European
leaders to rock the boat, there’s still room for optimism.
Many experts agree that the biggest achievement of the EU talks is that
European parliamentarians have agreed to go to Georgia. Then they’ll see
with their own eyes what has been happening in the conflict zones.
Our partnership with EU is mutually beneficial - Russia
Russia Today, September 2, 2008, 18:37
In a statement commenting on the emergency EU summit concerning the
situation in the Caucasus, Russia’s Foreign Ministry said Russia-EU
cooperation should not be “a hostage to divergence of opinion on
particular issues” and Moscow is ready for further dialogue with Europe
in all spheres.
"The results of the EU summit have been quite predictable as there had
been no lack of announcements by European politicians preceding it. Some
countries have called for introducing sanctions against Russia and
freezing relations with it, they have tried to denounce our policy,
though based on distorting the facts which had led to the conflict in
the Caucasus. Nevertheless, the most important thing is that the
majority of the EU member countries have demonstrated a responsible
approach to the issue and confirmed their course towards the partnership
with Russia as they realise the significance of mutually beneficial
cooperation, in the framework of which a lot has been achieved lately.
Obviously we cannot agree with a number of preconceived pronouncements
about Russia, which the concluding summit declaration contains,
including the thesis about our disproportionate reaction to Georgia’s
aggression. By the way, Georgia’s actions haven’t been given any
assessment by the summit, as well as the actions of those who had been
supplying Georgia with arms in violation of OSCE and EU rules.
As for the practical conclusions of the EU summit, we regret the
intention to suspend talks on the new Russia-EU partnership agreement
though Moscow has got used to feigned obstacles to this agreement during
the last two years. We are interested in signing it to the same extent
as the EU. As for now, there are enough possibilities for the
development of the mutually beneficial cooperation of Russia and the
European countries in various fields.
On the whole, we suppose that our partnership with the EU should not be
a hostage to the divergence of opinion on particular questions.
Our partnership is of mutual benefit, and it would be at least imprudent
to put it under threat. For our part we are ready for constructive and
equal cooperation and continuing dialogue on all issues, including those
where our positions differ. In fact, this is the way partners should
deal with each other.
Based on this approach, it is possible to find solutions to the most
complicated problems, as the initiative of the French President has
proved. It resulted in the signing of the Medvedev-Sarkozy plan on
August 12 in Moscow for the settlement of the situation which followed
the attack by the Georgian troops on Tskhinval. Russia strictly adheres
to the six-point agreement and does not attempt to rewrite it. We have
fulfilled all necessary conditions required on our part. We have also
made concrete suggestions about how to implement issues related to steps
by the international community. We are actively working with the OSCE to
enlarge the number of its observers in Georgia, we have suggested
setting up an international police presence under its auspices, and we
are for an active role of the EU in these structures. Their full
implementation in the security zones, their demilitarisation and
agreements guaranteeing the non-use of force against South Ossetia and
Abkhazia will allow the creation of international mechanisms to provide
security in these republics in compliance with points five and six of
the Medvedev-Sarkozy plan. Certainly, it is necessary to make sure that
Georgian troops return to their barracks.
We expect that in the course of the forthcoming visit of the French
President to Moscow on September 8, the issues of the practical
implementation of the plan will be discussed," the statement says.
Most important points of Medvedev-Sarkozy not implemented - Moscow
Moscow does not see the implementation of one of the most important
points of the Medvedev-Sarkozy plan, that is the return of Georgian
troops to their barracks.
comes from Russia’s Foreign Ministry spokesman Andrey Nesterenko on
He also said Georgia is organising provocations against the Russian
military in the conflict zone. “Georgia is actively trying to restore
the military efficiency of its forces,” said Nesterenko.
He added that on Monday there were demonstrations near the security
point of Karameti which were marked by provocations against Russian
“We have information that these demonstrations were specially organised,
possibly, by the corresponding Georgian authorities,” he said.
Although Georgia earlier said it was severing diplomatic ties with
Russia, Moscow has not yet received any official documents to this end,
the Foreign Ministry spokesman told journalists.
Two American, one Polish, one Spanish and one German ship are currently
stationed in the Black Sea.
“Only three countries, Turkey, Romania and Bulgaria, have the right to
keep as many ships in the Black Sea, as they judge it necessary as they
are considered to be coastal countries,” said Nesterenko.
This site contains copyrighted material the
use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright
owner. We are making such material available in our efforts to advance
understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic,
democracy, scientific, and social justice issues, etc. We believe this
constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for
in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C.
Section 107, the material on this site is
distributed without profit to those
who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information
for research and educational purposes. For more information go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml.
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this site for purposes of
your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the